作者
Shri Prakash Singh, Siddhivinayak Hirve, M Mamun Huda, Megha Raj Banjara, Narendra Kumar, Dinesh Mondal, Shyam Sundar, Pradeep Das, Chitra Kumar Gurung, Suman Rijal, CP Thakur, Beena Varghese, Axel Kroeger
发表日期
2011/2/8
期刊
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
卷号
5
期号
2
页码范围
e960
出版商
Public Library of Science
简介
Background The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh. Methodology/Principal Findings First, VL screening (fever more than 14 days, splenomegaly, rK39 test) was performed in camps. This was followed by house to house screening (blanket approach). An analysis of secondary VL cases in the neighborhood of index cases was simulated (index case approach). A second screening round was repeated 4–6 months later. In another sub-district in India and Nepal, health workers received incentives for detecting new VL cases over a 4 month period (incentive approach). This was followed by house screening for undetected cases. A total of 28 new VL cases were identified by blanket approach in the 1st screening round, and used as ACD gold standard. Of these, the camp approach identified 22 (sensitivity 78.6%), index case approach identified 12 (sensitivity–42.9%), and incentive approach identified 23 new VL cases out of 29 cases detected by the house screening (sensitivity–79.3%). The effort required to detect a new VL case varied (blanket approach–1092 households, incentive approach–978 households; index case approach–788 households had to be screened). The cost per new case detected varied (camp approach 21– 661; index case approach 149– 200; incentive based approach 50– 543; blanket screening 112– 629). The 2nd screening round yielded 20 new VL …
学术搜索中的文章
SP Singh, S Hirve, MM Huda, MR Banjara, N Kumar… - PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011