作者
Tsuyoshi Shiina, Kathryn R Nightingale, Mark L Palmeri, Timothy J Hall, Jeffrey C Bamber, Richard G Barr, Laurent Castera, Byung Ihn Choi, Yi-Hong Chou, David Cosgrove, Christoph F Dietrich, Hong Ding, Dominique Amy, Andre Farrokh, Giovanna Ferraioli, Carlo Filice, Mireen Friedrich-Rust, Kazutaka Nakashima, Fritz Schafer, Ioan Sporea, Shinichi Suzuki, Stephanie Wilson, Masatoshi Kudo
发表日期
2015/5/31
期刊
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
卷号
41
期号
5
页码范围
1126-1147
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Conventional diagnostic ultrasound images of the anatomy (as opposed to blood flow) reveal differences in the acoustic properties of soft tissues (mainly echogenicity but also, to some extent, attenuation), whereas ultrasound-based elasticity images are able to reveal the differences in the elastic properties of soft tissues (e.g., elasticity and viscosity). The benefit of elasticity imaging lies in the fact that many soft tissues can share similar ultrasonic echogenicities but may have different mechanical properties that can be used to clearly visualize normal anatomy and delineate pathologic lesions. Typically, all elasticity measurement and imaging methods introduce a mechanical excitation and monitor the resulting tissue response. Some of the most widely available commercial elasticity imaging methods are ‘quasi-static’ and use external tissue compression to generate images of the resulting tissue strain (or deformation …
引用总数
201520162017201820192020202120222023202415759911513813114015311968
学术搜索中的文章