作者
And Yara Particelli Gelmini, Márcio Luís Duarte, Mayara Oliveira da Silva, Josias Bueno Guimarães, Lucas Ribeiro dos Santos
发表日期
2022/8/8
来源
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
卷号
140
期号
4
页码范围
604-614
出版商
Associação Paulista de Medicina-APM
简介
BACKGROUND
Augmented reality (AR) involves digitally overlapping virtual objects onto physical objects in real space so that individuals can interact with both at the same time. AR in medical education seeks to reduce surgical complications through high-quality education. There is uncertainty in the use of AR as a learning tool for interventional radiology procedures.
OBJECTIVE
To compare AR with other learning methods in interventional radiology.
DESIGN AND SETTING
Systematic review of comparative studies on teaching techniques.
METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Tripdatabase, ERIC, CINAHL, SciELO and LILACS electronic databases for studies comparing AR simulation with other teaching methods in interventional radiology. This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA and the BEME Collaboration. Eligible studies were evaluated using the quality indicators provided in the BEME Collaboration Guide no. 11, and the Kirkpatrick model.
RESULTS
Four randomized clinical trials were included in this review. The level of educational evidence found among all the papers was 2B, according to the Kirkpatrick model. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was applied to assess the risk of bias for individual studies and across studies. Three studies showed an improvement in teaching of the proposed procedure through AR; one study showed that the participants took longer to perform the procedure through AR.
CONCLUSION
AR, as a complementary teaching tool, can …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章