作者
Giuseppe Di Gioia, Jeroen Sonck, Miroslaw Ferenc, Shao-Liang Chen, Iginio Colaiori, Emanuele Gallinoro, Takuya Mizukami, Monika Kodeboina, Sakura Nagumo, Danilo Franco, Jozef Bartunek, Marc Vanderheyden, Eric Wyffels, Bernard De Bruyne, Jens F Lassen, Johan Bennett, Dobrin Vassilev, Patrick W Serruys, Goran Stankovic, Yves Louvard, Emanuele Barbato, Carlos Collet
发表日期
2020/6/22
来源
Cardiovascular Interventions
卷号
13
期号
12
页码范围
1432-1444
出版商
American College of Cardiology Foundation
简介
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques.
Background
Despite several randomized trials, the optimal PCI technique for bifurcation lesions remains a matter of debate. Provisional stenting has been recommended as the default technique for most bifurcation lesions. Emerging data support double-kissing crush (DK-crush) as a 2-stent technique.
Methods
PubMed and Scopus were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing PCI bifurcation techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions. Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes of interest were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel or lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Results
Twenty-one …
学术搜索中的文章
G Di Gioia, J Sonck, M Ferenc, SL Chen, I Colaiori… - Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020