作者
Christopher J Hopwood, Roman Kotov, Robert F Krueger, David Watson, Thomas A Widiger, Robert R Althoff, Emily B Ansell, Bo Bach, R Michael Bagby, Mark A Blais, Marina A Bornovalova, Michael Chmielewski, David C Cicero, Christopher Conway, Barbara De Clercq, Filip De Fruyt, Anna R Docherty, Nicholas R Eaton, John F Edens, Miriam K Forbes, Kelsie T Forbush, Michael P Hengartner, Masha Y Ivanova, Daniel Leising, W John Livesley, Mark R Lukowitsky, Donald R Lynam, Kristian E Markon, Joshua D Miller, Leslie C Morey, Stephanie N Mullins‐Sweatt, J Hans Ormel, Christopher J Patrick, Aaron L Pincus, Camilo Ruggero, Douglas B Samuel, Martin Sellbom, Tim Slade, Jennifer L Tackett, Katherine M Thomas, Timothy J Trull, David D Vachon, Irwin D Waldman, Monika A Waszczuk, Mark H Waugh, Aidan GC Wright, Mathew M Yalch, David H Zald, Johannes Zimmermann
发表日期
2018/2
期刊
Personality and mental health
卷号
12
期号
1
页码范围
82-86
简介
In contrast, there is a vast body of empirical literature supporting dimensional models of personality disorder that are closely aligned with the proposed model 8–11, inadditiontotheemerging body of work on the specific dimensions proposed for ICD-11 12–19. The ICD-11 proposal has two elements. The severity dimension has ties to the psychodynamic tradition 20, 21, which has historically been at the forefront of personality disorder classification, and aligns with a number of empirical efforts to quantify general personality dysfunction (eg 22–27). Research demonstrates that much of the predictive and prognostic value in personality disorder data can be derived from such a dimension 28.
The personality trait model proposed for ICD-11 resembles other dimensional models of personality such as the Five-Factor Model or the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders 16, 29, 30. Although there are some …
学术搜索中的文章
CJ Hopwood, R Kotov, RF Krueger, D Watson… - Personality and mental health, 2018