作者
Clifton W Callaway, Jasmeet Soar, Mayuki Aibiki, Bernd W Böttiger, Steven C Brooks, Charles D Deakin, Michael W Donnino, Saul Drajer, Walter Kloeck, Peter T Morley, Laurie J Morrison, Robert W Neumar, Tonia C Nicholson, Jerry P Nolan, Kazuo Okada, Brian J O’Neil, Edison F Paiva, Michael J Parr, Tzong-Luen Wang, Jonathan Witt
发表日期
2015/10/20
来源
Circulation
卷号
132
期号
16_suppl_1
页码范围
S84-S145
出版商
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
简介
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Advanced Life Support (ALS) Task Force performed detailed systematic reviews based on the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies1 and using the methodological approach proposed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. 2 Questions to be addressed (using the PICO [population, intervention, comparator, outcome] format) 3 were prioritized by ALS Task Force members (by voting). Prioritization criteria included awareness of significant new data and new controversies or questions about practice. Questions about topics no longer relevant to contemporary practice or where little new research has occurred were given lower priority. The ALS Task Force prioritized 42 PICO questions for review. With the assistance of information specialists, a detailed …
引用总数
20152016201720182019202020212022202320241135465141485421228