作者
Brian C Werner, Cody L Evans, Russel E Holzgrefe, Jeffrey M Tuman, Joseph M Hart, Eric W Carson, David R Diduch, Mark D Miller, Stephen F Brockmeier
发表日期
2014/11
期刊
The American journal of sports medicine
卷号
42
期号
11
页码范围
2583-2590
出版商
SAGE Publications
简介
Background
While a vast body of literature exists describing biceps tenodesis techniques and evaluating the biomechanical aspects of tenodesis locations or various implants, little literature presents useful clinical outcomes to guide surgeons in their decision to perform a particular method of tenodesis.
Purpose/Hypothesis
To compare the clinical outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSPBT) and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT). Our null hypothesis was that both methods would yield satisfactory results with regard to shoulder and biceps function, postoperative shoulder scores, pain relief, and complications.
Study Design
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods
Patients who underwent either ASPBT or OSPBT for isolated superior labrum or long head of the biceps lesions with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were evaluated with several validated clinical outcome measures and …
引用总数
2015201620172018201920202021202220232024321201523281412146
学术搜索中的文章