作者
Gordon F Tomaselli, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Adam Cuker, Paul P Dobesh, John U Doherty, John W Eikelboom, Roberta Florido, William Hucker, Roxana Mehran, Steven R Messé, Charles V Pollack, Fatima Rodriguez, Ravindra Sarode, Deborah Siegal, Barbara S Wiggins
发表日期
2017/12/19
来源
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
卷号
70
期号
24
页码范围
3042-3067
出版商
American College of Cardiology Foundation
简介
The American College of Cardiology (ACC) develops a number of policy documents to provide members with guidance on clinical topics. Although clinical practice guidelines remain the primary mechanism for offering evidence-based recommendations, such guidelines may contain gaps in how to make clinical decisions, particularly when equipoise is present in a topic. Expert Consensus Documents are intended to provide guidance for clinicians in areas in which evidence may be limited or new and evolving, or in which data are insufficient to fully inform clinical decision making. In an effort to increase the impact of ACC policy on patient care, an ACC Presidential Task Force was formed in 2014 to examine the ACC’s clinical documents. The main recommendation of the Task Force was a new focus on concise decision pathways and/or key points of care, instead of the traditional longer documents. The Task Force …
引用总数
2016201720182019202020212022202320242255708970343716