作者
Vincent I Lau, Feng Xie, John Basmaji, Deborah J Cook, Robert Fowler, Michel Kiflen, Emily Sirotich, Alla Iansavichene, Sean M Bagshaw, M Elizabeth Wilcox, Francois Lamontagne, Niall Ferguson, Bram Rochwerg
发表日期
2021/4/1
来源
Critical care medicine
卷号
49
期号
4
页码范围
575-588
出版商
LWW
简介
OBJECTIVES:
Cost utility analyses compare the costs and health outcome of interventions, with a denominator of quality-adjusted life year, a generic health utility measure combining both quality and quantity of life. Cost utility analyses are difficult to compare when methods are not standardized. It is unclear how cost utility analyses are measured/reported in critical care and what methodologic challenges cost utility analyses pose in this setting. This may lead to differences precluding cost utility analyses comparisons. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of cost utility analyses conducted in critical care. Our objectives were to understand: 1) methodologic characteristics, 2) how health-related quality-of-life was measured/reported, and 3) what costs were reported/measured.
DESIGN:
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES:
We systematically searched for cost utility analyses in critical care in MEDLINE, Embase …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章