Saviour siblings: a relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction M Taylor-Sands Routledge, 2013 | 39 | 2013 |
Ethical issues associated with prenatal screening using non‐invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidy M Johnston, C Warton, MD Pertile, M Taylor‐Sands, MB Delatycki, L Hui, ... Prenatal diagnosis 43 (2), 226-234, 2023 | 15 | 2023 |
Saviour siblings and collective family interests M Taylor-Sands Monash bioethics review 29 (2), 1-15, 2010 | 13 | 2010 |
Selecting" saviour siblings": reconsidering the regulation in Australia of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in conjunction with tissue typing. M Taylor-Sands Journal of law and Medicine 14 (4), 551-565, 2007 | 8 | 2007 |
Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child? MK Smith, M Taylor-Sands Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15, 139-153, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
Summary of Saviour Siblings M Taylor-Sands Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (12), 926-926, 2015 | 7 | 2015 |
Corporate Governments” as Model Litigants’(2007) C Cameron, M Taylor-Sands Legal Ethics 10, 154, 0 | 7 | |
Judicial Discomfort over ‘Innovative’Treatment for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria MM Taylor-Sands, G Dimopoulos Medical law review 30 (3), 479-508, 2022 | 6 | 2022 |
Fetal information as shared information: using NIPT to test for adult-onset conditions H Bowman-Smart, M Taylor-Sands Monash Bioethics Review 39 (Suppl 1), 82-102, 2021 | 6 | 2021 |
Legality of Embryonic Gene Editing in Australia. M Taylor-Sands, C Gyngell Journal of law and Medicine 26 (2), 356-373, 2018 | 6 | 2018 |
Re Imogen: the role of the Family Court of Australia in disputes over gender dysphoria treatment G Dimopoulos, M Taylor-Sands Monash bioethics review 39 (Suppl 1), 42-66, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
Saviour Siblings: reply to critics M Taylor-Sands Journal of medical ethics 41 (12), 933-934, 2015 | 5 | 2015 |
Removing donor anonymity: what does it achieve? Revisiting the welfare of donor-conceived individuals M Taylor-Sands UNSWLJ 41, 555, 2018 | 4 | 2018 |
Creating saviour siblings: reconsidering the role of the welfare of the child principle in regulating pre-implantation tissue typing in Australia M Taylor-Sands University of Melbourne, Melbourne Law School, 2010 | 4 | 2010 |
Non-invasive prenatal testing for adultonset conditions: Reproductive choice and the welfare of the future child M Taylor-Sands, H Bowman-Smart Melbourne University Law Review 45 (2), 730-778, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
Non-medical sex selection in Australia: Public views and bioethical concerns M Taylor-Sands, MK Smith, H Fraser, M King QUT Law Review 18 (2), 44-76, 2018 | 2 | 2018 |
Response to ‘A relational approach to Saviour Siblings?’by Selgelid M Taylor-Sands Journal of medical ethics 42 (10), 685-686, 2016 | 2 | 2016 |
" Playing Fair": governments as Litigants Cameron, Professor Camille, M Taylor-Sands Civil Justice Quarterly 26, 497-523, 2007 | 2 | 2007 |
“Corporate Governments” as Model Litigants C Cameron, M Taylor-Sands Legal Ethics 10 (2), 154-175, 2007 | 2 | 2007 |
From clinical to judicial decision-making, and back again in Bell v. Tavistock? Preparing for the legacy of court involvement in gender care for minors F Garland, E Horowicz, G Dimopoulos, M Taylor-Sands Medical Law International 23 (3), 209-240, 2023 | 1 | 2023 |