How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data D Fanelli PloS one 4 (5), e5738, 2009 | 2267 | 2009 |
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries D Fanelli Scientometrics 90 (3), 891-904, 2012 | 1423 | 2012 |
What does research reproducibility mean? SN Goodman, D Fanelli, JPA Ioannidis Science translational medicine 8 (341), 341ps12-341ps12, 2016 | 1200 | 2016 |
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data D Fanelli PloS one 5 (4), e10271, 2010 | 912 | 2010 |
“Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences D Fanelli PloS one 5 (4), e10068, 2010 | 911 | 2010 |
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? D Fanelli Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11), 2628-2631, 2018 | 469 | 2018 |
Meta-research: evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices JPA Ioannidis, D Fanelli, DD Dunne, SN Goodman PLoS biology 13 (10), e1002264, 2015 | 417 | 2015 |
Meta-assessment of bias in science D Fanelli, R Costas, JPA Ioannidis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (14), 3714-3719, 2017 | 365 | 2017 |
Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity D Fanelli, R Costas, V Larivière PloS one 10 (6), e0127556, 2015 | 288 | 2015 |
Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign D Fanelli PLoS medicine 10 (12), e1001563, 2013 | 245 | 2013 |
Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a century D Fanelli, V Larivière PloS one 11 (3), e0149504, 2016 | 211 | 2016 |
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine F Naudet, C Sakarovitch, P Janiaud, I Cristea, D Fanelli, D Moher, ... Bmj 360, 2018 | 205 | 2018 |
Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences D Fanelli, W Glänzel PLoS one 8 (6), e66938, 2013 | 193 | 2013 |
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research D Fanelli, JPA Ioannidis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (37), 15031-15036, 2013 | 170 | 2013 |
Scientists admitting to plagiarism: a meta-analysis of surveys V Pupovac, D Fanelli Science and engineering ethics 21, 1331-1352, 2015 | 142 | 2015 |
Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting D Fanelli Nature 494 (7436), 149-149, 2013 | 113 | 2013 |
Positive results receive more citations, but only in some disciplines D Fanelli Scientometrics 94 (2), 701-709, 2013 | 93 | 2013 |
Reproductive constraints, direct fitness and indirect fitness benefits explain helping behaviour in the primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes canadensis S Sumner, H Kelstrup, D Fanelli Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 (1688), 1721-1728, 2010 | 55 | 2010 |
Any publicity is better than none: newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy D Fanelli Scientometrics 95 (3), 1167-1177, 2013 | 50 | 2013 |
Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections D Fanelli, JPA Ioannidis, S Goodman Eur J Clin Invest 48 (4), e12898, 2018 | 48 | 2018 |