Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—rethinking agri-environmental payments K Prager, M Reed, A Scott Land use policy 29 (1), 244-249, 2012 | 263 | 2012 |
Socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil conservation practices in Europe K Prager, H Posthumus Human dimensions of soil and water conservation 12, 1-21, 2010 | 212 | 2010 |
Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe K Prager Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12, 59–66, 2015 | 198 | 2015 |
Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management J Westerink, R Jongeneel, N Polman, K Prager, J Franks, P Dupraz, ... Land Use Policy 69, 176-192, 2017 | 189 | 2017 |
Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes MS Reed, A Moxey, K Prager, N Hanley, J Skates, A Bonn, CD Evans, ... Ecosystem Services 9, 44-53, 2014 | 167 | 2014 |
Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making–Learning from a local-and a state-level approach in Germany K Prager, J Freese Journal of environmental management 90 (2), 1154-1167, 2009 | 162 | 2009 |
Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital E Carmen, I Fazey, H Ross, M Bedinger, FM Smith, K Prager, ... Ambio 51 (6), 1371-1387, 2022 | 152 | 2022 |
Pluralism of agricultural advisory service providers–Facts and insights from Europe A Knierim, P Labarthe, C Laurent, K Prager, J Kania, L Madureira, ... Journal of rural studies 55, 45-58, 2017 | 145 | 2017 |
How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK K Prager, P Labarthe, M Caggiano, A Lorenzo-Arribas Land Use Policy 52, 329-344, 2016 | 126 | 2016 |
The AKIS concept and its relevance in selected EU member states A Knierim, K Boenning, M Caggiano, A Cristóvão, V Dirimanova, ... Outlook on AGRICULTURE 44 (1), 29-36, 2015 | 115 | 2015 |
Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: the challenge of bridging institutional levels K Prager Environmental management 46, 711-724, 2010 | 111 | 2010 |
Soil degradation, farming practices, institutions and policy responses: An analytical framework K Prager, J Schuler, K Helming, P Zander, T Ratinger, K Hagedorn Land degradation & development 22 (1), 32-46, 2011 | 92 | 2011 |
Participatory decision making on agri-environmental programmes: A case study from Sachsen-Anhalt (Germany) K Prager, UJ Nagel Land Use Policy 25 (1), 106-115, 2008 | 88 | 2008 |
Criteria for a system level evaluation of farm advisory services K Prager, R Creaney, A Lorenzo-Arribas Land use policy 61, 86-98, 2017 | 75 | 2017 |
Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management K Prager, F Vanclay Ecological management & restoration 11 (3), 187-193, 2010 | 74 | 2010 |
Achieving on-farm practice change through facilitated group learning: Evaluating the effectiveness of monitor farms and discussion groups K Prager, R Creaney Journal of Rural Studies 56, 1-11, 2017 | 71 | 2017 |
How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management? K Prager, B Nienaber, B Neumann, A Phillips Journal of Rural Studies 37, 120-131, 2015 | 70 | 2015 |
Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management K Prager Journal of environmental management 161, 375-384, 2015 | 63 | 2015 |
Understanding behaviour change: how to apply theories of behaviour change to SEWeb and related public engagement activities K Prager James Hutton Institute, 2012 | 62* | 2012 |
Using mental models to understand soil management K Prager, M Curfs Soil Use and Management 32 (1), 36-44, 2016 | 56 | 2016 |