Who wants to deliberate—and why? MA Neblo, KM Esterling, RP Kennedy, DMJ Lazer, AE Sokhey American Political Science Review 104 (3), 566-583, 2010 | 587 | 2010 |
Promoting transparency in social science research E Miguel, C Camerer, K Casey, J Cohen, KM Esterling, A Gerber, ... Science 343 (6166), 30-31, 2014 | 528 | 2014 |
The political economy of expertise: Information and efficiency in American national politics K Esterling University of Michigan Press, 2004 | 304 | 2004 |
Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? DP Carpenter, KM Esterling, DMJ Lazer The journal of Politics 66 (1), 224-246, 2004 | 273 | 2004 |
Politics with the people: Building a directly representative democracy MA Neblo, KM Esterling, DMJ Lazer Cambridge University Press, 2018 | 201 | 2018 |
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model CK Soderberg, TM Errington, SR Schiavone, J Bottesini, FS Thorn, ... Nature Human Behaviour 5 (8), 990-997, 2021 | 187* | 2021 |
The strength of weak ties in lobbying networks: Evidence from health-care politics in the United States DP Carpenter, KM Esterling, DMJ Lazer Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (4), 417-444, 1998 | 163 | 1998 |
Buying expertise: Campaign contributions and attention to policy analysis in congressional committees KM Esterling American Political Science Review 101 (1), 93-109, 2007 | 156 | 2007 |
The strength of strong ties: A model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from US health politics D Carpenter, K Esterling, D Lazer Rationality and Society 15 (4), 411-440, 2003 | 142 | 2003 |
Means, motive, and opportunity in becoming informed about politics: A deliberative field experiment with members of Congress and their constituents KM Esterling, MA Neblo, DMJ Lazer Public opinion quarterly 75 (3), 483-503, 2011 | 123 | 2011 |
Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls W Minozzi, MA Neblo, KM Esterling, DMJ Lazer Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (13), 3937-3942, 2015 | 88 | 2015 |
How much disagreement is good for democratic deliberation? KM Esterling, A Fung, T Lee Political Communication 32 (4), 529-551, 2015 | 86* | 2015 |
“Deliberative disagreement” in US health policy committee hearings KM Esterling Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (2), 169-198, 2011 | 56 | 2011 |
Pharmaceutical drugs chatter on online social networks MT Wiley, C Jin, V Hristidis, KM Esterling Journal of biomedical informatics 49, 245-254, 2014 | 52 | 2014 |
Online Town Hall Meetings–Exploring Democracy in the 21st Century D Lazer, M Neblo, K Esterling, K Goldschmidt Congressional Management Foundation, Washington, DC, 2009 | 45 | 2009 |
Judicial Accountability the Right Way: official performance evaluations help the electorate as well as the bench KM Esterling Judicature 82, 206, 1998 | 41 | 1998 |
Estimating treatment effects in the presence of noncompliance and nonresponse: The generalized endogenous treatment model KM Esterling, MA Neblo, DMJ Lazer Political Analysis 19 (2), 205-226, 2011 | 37 | 2011 |
Expanding the conversation: Multiplier effects from a deliberative field experiment DM Lazer, AE Sokhey, MA Neblo, KM Esterling, R Kennedy Political Communication 32 (4), 552-573, 2015 | 34 | 2015 |
Illegality, national origin cues, and public opinion on immigration K Ramakrishnan, K Esterling, M Neblo, D Lazer Unpublished Manuscript accessed online at http://politicalscience. osu. edu …, 2010 | 32 | 2010 |
Diversity and the judicial merit selection process: a statistical report KM Esterling, SS Andersen Research on Judicial Selection 2, 2-39, 1999 | 30 | 1999 |