Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK … J Chubb, R Watermeyer Studies in higher education 42 (12), 2360-2372, 2017 | 228 | 2017 |
The politics of research impact: academic perceptions of the implications for research funding, motivation and quality J Chubb, MS Reed British Politics 13, 295-311, 2018 | 104 | 2018 |
Fear and loathing in the academy? The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia J Chubb, R Watermeyer, P Wakeling Academic Life in the Measured University, 103-116, 2020 | 99 | 2020 |
Evaluating ‘impact’in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF): liminality, looseness and new modalities of scholarly distinction R Watermeyer, J Chubb Studies in Higher Education 44 (9), 1554-1566, 2019 | 88 | 2019 |
Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process J Chubb, P Cowling, D Reed AI & society 37 (4), 1439-1457, 2022 | 81 | 2022 |
Boundaries between research ethics and ethical research use in artificial intelligence health research G Samuel, J Chubb, G Derrick Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 16 (3), 325-337, 2021 | 27 | 2021 |
The impact a-gender: gendered orientations towards research Impact and its evaluation J Chubb, GE Derrick Palgrave Communications 6 (1), 1-11, 2020 | 26 | 2020 |
Epistemic responsibility as an edifying force in academic research: investigating the moral challenges and opportunities of an impact agenda in the UK and Australia J Chubb, M Reed Palgrave Communications 3 (1), 1-5, 2017 | 26 | 2017 |
Interactive storytelling for children: A case-study of design and development considerations for ethical conversational AI J Chubb, S Missaoui, S Concannon, L Maloney, JA Walker International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 32, 100403, 2022 | 25 | 2022 |
Writing impact case studies: a comparative study of high-scoring and low-scoring case studies from REF2014 B Reichard, MS Reed, J Chubb, G Hall, L Jowett, A Peart, A Whittle Palgrave Communications 6 (1), 1-17, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
The real-time REF review: A pilot study to examine the feasibility of a longitudinal evaluation of perceptions and attitudes towards REF 2021 N Weinstein, J Wilsdon, J Chubb, G Haddock SocArXiv, 2019 | 25 | 2019 |
Epistemic corruption and the research impact agenda IJ Kidd, J Chubb, J Forstenzer Theory and Research in Education 19 (2), 148-167, 2021 | 22 | 2021 |
Expert views about missing AI narratives: is there an AI story crisis? J Chubb, D Reed, P Cowling AI & society, 1-20, 2022 | 19 | 2022 |
21st Century PhDs: Why we need better methods of tracking doctoral access, experiences and outcomes SE Hancock, PBJ Wakeling, JA Chubb | 19 | 2019 |
Instrumentalism and epistemic responsibility: Researchers and the impact agenda in the UK and Australia JA Chubb University of York, 2017 | 19 | 2017 |
A conducive environment? The role of need support in the higher education workplace and its effect on academics' experiences of research assessment in the UK N Weinstein, JA Chubb, G Haddock, JR Wilsdon Higher education quarterly 75 (1), 146-160, 2021 | 16 | 2021 |
How does the impact agenda fit with attitudes and ethics that motivate research J Chubb Achieving impact in research, 20-32, 2014 | 11 | 2014 |
Academics fear the value of knowledge for its own sake is diminishing J Chubb | 6 | 2021 |
Science diplomacy as a means to tackle infectious diseases: The case of Zika I Šlosarčík, N Meyer, J Chubb Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, 4, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
Academics admit feeling pressure to embellish possible impact of research J Chubb, R Watermeyer | 6 | 2016 |