| Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications EC Romanis Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11), 751-755, 2018 | 112 | 2018 |
| Challenging the ‘born alive’threshold: Fetal surgery, artificial wombs, and the English approach to legal personhood EC Romanis Medical Law Review 28 (1), 93-123, 2020 | 46* | 2020 |
| COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic EC Romanis, JA Parsons, N Hodson Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7 (1), lsaa027, 2020 | 38 | 2020 |
| Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID‐19 EC Romanis, JA Parsons International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 151 (3), 479-486, 2020 | 36 | 2020 |
| Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research? EC Romanis Bioethics 34 (4), 392-402, 2020 | 36 | 2020 |
| Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses) EC Romanis Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11), 728-731, 2019 | 34 | 2019 |
| Is ‘viability’viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States EC Romanis Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7 (1), lsaa059, 2020 | 31 | 2020 |
| Reviewing the womb EC Romanis, D Begović, MR Brazier, AK Mullock Journal of medical ethics 47 (12), 820-829, 2021 | 30 | 2021 |
| Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law? EC Romanis Medical Law Review 28 (2), 342-374, 2020 | 27 | 2020 |
| Artificial wombs and the ectogenesis conversation: A misplaced focus? Technology, abortion, and reproductive freedom E Chloe Romanis, C Horn IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (2), 174-194, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
| Homebirthing in the United Kingdom during COVID-19 EC Romanis, A Nelson Medical law international 20 (3), 183-200, 2020 | 23 | 2020 |
| Why the elective caesarean lottery is ethically impermissible EC Romanis Health Care Analysis 27 (4), 249-268, 2019 | 22 | 2019 |
| Establishing boundaries for speculation about artificial wombs, ectogenesis, gender, and the gestating body C Horn, EC Romanis A Jurisprudence of the Body, 227-254, 2020 | 20 | 2020 |
| Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective EC Romanis Journal of medical ethics 46 (2), 89-90, 2020 | 19 | 2020 |
| 2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK JA Parsons, EC Romanis Health Policy 125 (1), 17-21, 2021 | 18 | 2021 |
| Maternal request caesareans and COVID-19: the virus does not diminish the importance of choice in childbirth EC Romanis, A Nelson Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11), 726-731, 2020 | 16 | 2020 |
| Artificial womb technology, pregnancy, and EU employment rights V Hooton, EC Romanis Journal of Law and the Biosciences 9 (1), lsac009, 2022 | 14 | 2022 |
| Assisted gestative technologies EC Romanis Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (7), 439-446, 2022 | 13 | 2022 |
| Early medical abortion, equality of access, and the telemedical imperative JA Parsons, EC Romanis Oxford University Press, 2021 | 13 | 2021 |
| Home-Birthing and Free-Birthing in the era of COVID-19 A Nelson, EC Romanis BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Blog, 2020 | 12 | 2020 |
Jordan A. ParsonsUniversity of Birmingham在 bham.ac.uk 的电子邮件经过验证
