Why Summary Judgment Is Unconstitutional SA Thomas Virginia Law Review, 139-180, 2007 | 251 | 2007 |
Why the Motion to Dismiss Is Now Unconstitutional SA Thomas Minnesota Law Review 92, 07-15, 2008 | 124 | 2008 |
The New Summary Judgment Motion: The Motion to Dismiss Under Iqbal and Twombly SA Thomas Illinois Public Law Research Paper, 2009 | 97 | 2009 |
Re-Examining the Constitutionality of Remittitur Under the Seventh Amendment SA Thomas Ohio State Law Journal 64, 731, 2003 | 79 | 2003 |
Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure, The SA Thomas BCL Rev. 50, 759, 2009 | 61 | 2009 |
Oddball Iqbal and Twombly and Employment Discrimination SA Thomas University of Illinois Law Review 2011 (1), 10-09, 2011 | 59 | 2011 |
The Seventh Amendment, Modern Procedure and the English Common Law SA Thomas Washington University Law Quarterly 82, 687, 2004 | 56 | 2004 |
Summary Judgment and the Reasonable Jury Standard: A Proxy for a Judge's Own View of the Sufficiency of the Evidence? SA Thomas Judicature 97 (5), 14-35, 2014 | 40* | 2014 |
Summary Judgment and the Reasonable Jury Standard: A Proxy for a Judge's Own View of the Sufficiency of the Evidence SA Thomas Judicature 97, 222, 2013 | 40* | 2013 |
Judicial Modesty and the Jury SA Thomas U. Colo. L. Rev. 76, 767, 2005 | 40 | 2005 |
Blackstone's Curse: The Fall of the Criminal, Civil, and Grand Juries and the Rise of the Executive, the Legislature, the Judiciary, and the States SA Thomas William & Mary Law Review 55 (3), 14-34, 2014 | 34 | 2014 |
A Limitation on Congress:'In Suits at Common Law' SA Thomas Ohio State Law Journal 71 (5), 1071, 2010 | 32 | 2010 |
Frivolous Cases SA Thomas DePaul Law Review 59, 633, 2010 | 31 | 2010 |
Fakers and Floodgates S Sperino, SA Thomas Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 2014 | 27 | 2014 |
The Missing American Jury SA Thomas Cambridge University Press, 2016 | 20 | 2016 |
How Atypical Cases Make Bad Rules: A Commentary on the Rulemaking Process SA Thomas, D Price Nevada Law Journal 15, 2014-15, 2015 | 20 | 2015 |
Nonincorporation: The Bill of Rights after McDonald v. Chicago SA Thomas notre dame law review 88, 13-04, 2012 | 20 | 2012 |
How Atypical, Hard Cases Make Bad Law (See, eg, The Lack of Judicial Restraint in Twombly, Wal-Mart, and Ricci) SA Thomas Wake Forest Law Review 48, 13-43, 2013 | 18* | 2013 |
How Atypical, Hard Cases Make Bad Law (See, EG, the Lack of Judicial Restraint in Wal-Mart, Twombly, and RICCI) SA Thomas Wake Forest L. Rev. 48, 989, 2013 | 18 | 2013 |
The Unconstitutionality of Summary Judgment: A Status Report SA Thomas Iowa Law Review 93 (5), 2008 | 16 | 2008 |