Measuring laypeople’s trust in experts in a digital age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI) F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme PloS one 10 (10), e0139309, 2015 | 276 | 2015 |
Trust in science and the science of trust F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme Trust and communication in a digitized world: Models and concepts of trust …, 2016 | 204 | 2016 |
Replication crisis= trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople’s trust in researchers and research F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme Public Understanding of Science 29 (3), 270-288, 2020 | 54 | 2020 |
Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis) trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog? F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme Public Understanding of Science 25 (8), 992-1008, 2016 | 45 | 2016 |
Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme Studies in Communication Sciences 16 (2), 124-131, 2016 | 42 | 2016 |
Predicting public trust in science: The role of basic orientations toward science, perceived trustworthiness of scientists, and experiences with science F Wintterlin, F Hendriks, NG Mede, R Bromme, J Metag, MS Schäfer Frontiers in Communication 6, 822757, 2022 | 35 | 2022 |
Does scientific uncertainty in news articles affect readers’ trust and decision-making? F Hendriks, R Jucks Media and Communication 8 (2), 401-412, 2020 | 31 | 2020 |
Face masks might protect you from COVID-19: The communication of scientific uncertainty by scientists versus politicians in the context of policy in the making I Janssen, F Hendriks, R Jucks Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40 (5-6), 602-626, 2021 | 29 | 2021 |
Science understanding between scientific literacy and trust: contributions from psychological and educational research F Hendriks, D Kienhues Handbook of Communication Science, Vol. 17: Science Communication, 29-50, 2019 | 28 | 2019 |
Unraveling the “smart but evil” stereotype: Pre-service teachers' evaluations of educational psychology researchers versus teachers as sources of information F Hendriks, E Seifried, C Menz Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 2021 | 26 | 2021 |
Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review F Hendriks, E Mayweg-Paus, M Felton, K Iordanou, R Jucks, ... Frontiers in Psychology 11, 572744, 2020 | 24 | 2020 |
Reducing educational psychological misconceptions: How effective are standard lectures, refutation lectures, and instruction in information evaluation strategies? C Menz, B Spinath, F Hendriks, E Seifried Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2021 | 21 | 2021 |
Balance as credibility? How presenting one-vs. two-sided messages affects ratings of scientists’ and politicians’ trustworthiness F Hendriks, I Janssen, R Jucks Health communication 38 (12), 2757-2764, 2023 | 18 | 2023 |
How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty and what that means for the audience S Dunwoody, F Hendriks, L Massarani, HP Peters 15th International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference …, 2018 | 11 | 2018 |
Methodological and practical challenges of interdisciplinary trust research F Hendriks, B Distel, KM Engelke, D Westmattelmann, F Wintterlin Trust and Communication: Findings and Implications of Trust Research, 29-57, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
Introduction: language and communication related to COVID-19 R Jucks, F Hendriks Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40 (5-6), 540-545, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
Researchers’ public engagement in the context of interdisciplinary research programs: Learning and reflection from boundary crossing F Hendriks, R Bromme Science Communication 44 (6), 693-718, 2022 | 3 | 2022 |
Vertrauenswürdigkeit ohne Vertrauen? Wie die Kommunikation wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten die Bewertungen und Entscheidungen von Rezipienten beeinflusst [Trustworthiness but … S Westphal, F Hendriks, M Malik Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel, 342-365, 2015 | 3 | 2015 |
Trust in science: When the public considers whom to trust-the example of COVID-19 R Bromme, F Hendriks PsyArXiv, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
METI-Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory F Hendriks, D Kienhues, R Bromme ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information)–Testarchiv, 2017 | 1 | 2017 |