Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: The issue of understandability D Fahland, D Lübke, J Mendling, H Reijers, B Weber, M Weidlich, S Zugal Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, 353-366, 2009 | 262 | 2009 |
Imperative versus Declarative Process Modeling Languages: An Empirical Investigation P Pichler, B Weber, S Zugal, J Pinggera, J Mendling, HA Reijers | 223* | |
The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring B Holzner, JM Giesinger, J Pinggera, S Zugal, F Schöpf, ... BMC medical informatics and decision making 12, 1-11, 2012 | 186 | 2012 |
Understanding declare models: strategies, pitfalls, empirical results C Haisjackl, I Barba, S Zugal, P Soffer, I Hadar, M Reichert, J Pinggera, ... Software & Systems Modeling 15 (2), 325-352, 2016 | 111 | 2016 |
Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model J Pinggera, P Soffer, D Fahland, M Weidlich, S Zugal, B Weber, ... Software & Systems Modeling 14, 1055-1080, 2015 | 106 | 2015 |
Investigating the process of process modeling with cheetah experimental platform J Pinggera, S Zugal, B Weber Proc. ER-POIS 10, 13-18, 2010 | 99 | 2010 |
Investigating expressiveness and understandability of hierarchy in declarative business process models S Zugal, P Soffer, C Haisjackl, J Pinggera, M Reichert, B Weber Software & Systems Modeling 14, 1081-1103, 2015 | 84 | 2015 |
Generating event logs from non-process-aware systems enabling business process mining R Perez-Castillo, B Weber, J Pinggera, S Zugal, IGR de Guzmán, ... Enterprise Information Systems 5 (3), 301-335, 2011 | 83 | 2011 |
Tracing the Process of Process Modeling with Modeling Phase Diagrams J Pinggera, S Zugal, M Weidlich, D Fahland, B Weber, J Mendling, ... | 83* | |
Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: the issue of maintainability D Fahland, J Mendling, HA Reijers, B Weber, M Weidlich, S Zugal Business Process Management Workshops, 477-488, 2010 | 79 | 2010 |
The impact of testcases on the maintainability of declarative process models S Zugal, J Pinggera, B Weber Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, 163-177, 2011 | 78 | 2011 |
Tying process model quality to the modeling process: the impact of structuring, movement, and speed J Claes, I Vanderfeesten, HA Reijers, J Pinggera, M Weidlich, S Zugal, ... Business Process Management: 10th International Conference, BPM 2012 …, 2012 | 75 | 2012 |
The declarative approach to business process execution: An empirical test B Weber, H Reijers, S Zugal, W Wild Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 470-485, 2009 | 71 | 2009 |
Toward enhanced life‐cycle support for declarative processes S Zugal, J Pinggera, B Weber Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 2011 | 60 | 2011 |
Assessing the Impact of Hierarchy on Model Understandability—A Cognitive Perspective S Zugal, J Pinggera, B Weber, J Mendling, HA Reijers | 60* | |
Creating Declarative Process Models Using Test Driven Modeling Suite S Zugal, J Pinggera, B Weber | 60* | |
Assessing Process Models with Cognitive Psychology S Zugal, J Pinggera, B Weber | 47* | |
Modeling styles in business process modeling J Pinggera, P Soffer, S Zugal, B Weber, M Weidlich, D Fahland, ... Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling: 13th …, 2012 | 44 | 2012 |
How the structuring of domain knowledge helps casual process modelers J Pinggera, S Zugal, B Weber, D Fahland, M Weidlich, J Mendling, ... Conceptual Modeling–ER 2010, 445-451, 2010 | 44 | 2010 |
Investigating the Process of Process Modeling with Eye Movement Analysis: (Full Paper) J Pinggera, M Furtner, M Martini, P Sachse, K Reiter, S Zugal, B Weber Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2012 International Workshops …, 2013 | 42 | 2013 |