| Copying in patent law CA Cotropia, MA Lemley NCL Rev. 87, 1421, 2008 | 297 | 2008 |
| Do applicant patent citations matter? CA Cotropia, MA Lemley, B Sampat Research Policy 42 (4), 844-854, 2013 | 214 | 2013 |
| Unpacking patent assertion entities (PAEs) CA Cotropia, JP Kesan, DL Schwartz Minn. L. Rev. 99, 649, 2014 | 192 | 2014 |
| The folly of early filing in patent law CA Cotropia Hastings LJ 61, 65, 2009 | 179 | 2009 |
| Modernizing patent law's inequitable conduct doctrine CA Cotropia Berkeley Tech. LJ 24, 723, 2009 | 111 | 2009 |
| Nonobviousness and the Federal Circuit: An Empirical Analysis of Recent Case Law CA Cotropia Notre Dame L. Rev. 82, 911, 2006 | 107 | 2006 |
| Patent claim interpretation methodologies and their claim scope paradigms CA Cotropia Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 47, 49, 2005 | 104 | 2005 |
| The upside of intellectual property's downside CA Cotropia, J Gibson UCLA L. Rev. 57, 921, 2009 | 95 | 2009 |
| After-Arising Technologies and Tailoring Patent Scope CA Cotropia NYU Ann. Surv. Am. L. 61, 151, 2005 | 83 | 2005 |
| The individual inventor motif in the age of the patent troll CA Cotropia Yale JL & Tech. 12, 52, 2009 | 78 | 2009 |
| Arising Under Jurisdiction and Uniformity in Patent Law CA Cotropia Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 9, 253, 2002 | 63 | 2002 |
| What is the Invention CA Cotropia Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 53, 1855, 2011 | 62 | 2011 |
| Describing patents as real options CA Cotropia J. Corp. L. 34, 1127, 2008 | 57 | 2008 |
| Determining Uniformity Within the Federal Circuit by Measuring Dissent and En Banc Review CA Cotropia Loy. LAL Rev. 43, 801, 2009 | 53 | 2009 |
| Patent claim interpretation and information costs CA Cotropia Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 9, 57, 2005 | 53 | 2005 |
| Gender disparity in law review citation rates CA Cotropia, L Petherbridge Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 59, 771, 2017 | 49 | 2017 |
| Copyright's Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation CA Cotropia, J Gibson TEx. L. REv. 92, 1981, 2013 | 40 | 2013 |
| Who benefits from repealing tampon taxes? Empirical evidence from New Jersey C Cotropia, K Rozema Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15 (3), 620-647, 2018 | 39 | 2018 |
| Predictability and Nonobviousness in Patent Law After KSR CA Cotropia Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 20, 391, 2013 | 36 | 2013 |
| Patent Law Viewed through an Evidentiary Lens: The Suggestion Test as a Rule of Evidence CA Cotropia BYU L. Rev., 1517, 2006 | 34 | 2006 |
Mark LemleyProfessor of Law, Stanford University在 law.stanford.edu 的电子邮件经过验证
