| The strategy of judging: Evidence from administrative law JL Smith, EH Tiller The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1), 61-82, 2002 | 145 | 2002 |
| Issue preferences and evaluations of the US Supreme Court MJ Hetherington, JL Smith Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (1), 40-66, 2007 | 76 | 2007 |
| Lawyer, interrupted: Gender bias in oral arguments at the US Supreme Court D Patton, JL Smith Journal of Law and Courts 5 (2), 337-361, 2017 | 62 | 2017 |
| Does Chevron Matter? MJ Richards, JL Smith, HM Kritzer Law & Policy 28 (4), 444-469, 2006 | 48 | 2006 |
| Congress opens the courthouse doors: Statutory changes to judicial review under the Clean Air Act JL Smith Political Research Quarterly 58 (1), 139-149, 2005 | 45 | 2005 |
| Patterns and consequences of judicial reversals: Theoretical considerations and data from a district court JL Smith Justice System Journal 27 (1), 28-46, 2006 | 39 | 2006 |
| Judicial procedures as instruments of political control: Congress's strategic use of citizen suits JL Smith Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2), 283-305, 2006 | 38 | 2006 |
| Presidents, justices, and deference to administrative action JL Smith The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23 (2), 346-364, 2007 | 31 | 2007 |
| The rhetoric of restraint and the ideology of activism SA Lindquist, JL Smith, FB Cross Const. Comment. 24, 103, 2007 | 17 | 2007 |
| Rules, standards, and lower court decisions JL Smith, JA Todd Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2), 257-275, 2015 | 13 | 2015 |
| Law, fact, and the threat of reversal from above JL Smith American Politics Research 42 (2), 226-256, 2014 | 13 | 2014 |
| B arack O bama's “Fight” to End Poverty: Rhetoric and Reality RC Fording, JL Smith Social Science Quarterly 93 (5), 1161-1184, 2012 | 10 | 2012 |
| Gender, ideology, and dominance in supreme court oral arguments D Patton, JL Smith Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 41 (4), 393-415, 2020 | 8 | 2020 |
| The strategy of judging: Evidence from administrative law JL Smith, EH Tiller Available at SSRN 11389, 1997 | 7 | 1997 |
| Deciding the Supreme Court’s Administrative Law Cases: Does Chevron Matter? HM Kritzer, MJ Richards, JL Smith Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA, 2002 | 6 | 2002 |
| Group identification and support for the Supreme Court: Evidence from evangelical protestants CD Kromphardt, JL Smith, AM Starling Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 58 (4), 854-873, 2019 | 4 | 2019 |
| Judicial procedures as instruments of political control JL Smith The University of Texas at Austin, 1999 | 3 | 1999 |
| Getting Personal in Supreme Court Opinions JL Smith Wash. UJL & Pol'y 54, 195, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
| Congressional control of judicial policy-making through the clean air act. JL Smith LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY 22 (4), 594-594, 1997 | 1 | 1997 |
| Barack Obama's' Fight'to End Poverty: Rhetoric and Reality Barack Obama's' Fight'to End Poverty: Rhetoric and Reality. RC Fording, JL Smith Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) 93 (5), 2012 | | 2012 |
