| Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect PA Stewart, BM Waller, JN Schubert Motivation and Emotion 33, 125-135, 2009 | 132 | 2009 |
| A defining presidential moment: 9/11 and the rally effect JN Schubert, PA Stewart, MA Curran Political psychology 23 (3), 559-583, 2002 | 125 | 2002 |
| The influence of self-and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election PA Stewart Social Science Information 50 (2), 201-222, 2011 | 76 | 2011 |
| Taking leaders at face value: Ethology and the analysis of televised leader displays PA Stewart, FK Salter, M Mehu Politics and the Life Sciences 28 (1), 48-74, 2009 | 73 | 2009 |
| Determinants of farmland value: the case of DeKalb County, Illinois PA Stewart, LW Libby Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 20 (1), 80-95, 1998 | 73* | 1998 |
| Conducting experiments in public management research: A practical guide M Bækgaard, C Baethge, J Blom-Hansen, CA Dunlop, M Esteve, ... International Public Management Journal 18 (2), 323-342, 2015 | 65 | 2015 |
| Disgust and the politics of sex: Exposure to a disgusting odorant increases politically conservative views on sex and decreases support for gay marriage TG Adams, PA Stewart, JC Blanchar PloS one 9 (5), e95572, 2014 | 63 | 2014 |
| Interpreting President Barack Obama's facial displays of emotion: Revisiting the Dartmouth group PA Stewart, PK Ford Dowe Political Psychology 34 (3), 369-385, 2013 | 50 | 2013 |
| Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers: A biobehavioral inventory of political smiles PA Stewart, EP Bucy, M Mehu Politics and the Life Sciences 34 (1), 73-92, 2015 | 43 | 2015 |
| Debatable humor: Laughing matters on the 2008 presidential primary campaign PA Stewart Lexington Books, 2012 | 41 | 2012 |
| Trends affecting the next generation of US agricultural biotechnology: Politics, policy, and plant-made pharmaceuticals PA Stewart, AJ Knight Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (5), 521-534, 2005 | 35 | 2005 |
| Public opinion toward the first, second, and third generations of plant biotechnology PA Stewart, WP McLean In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 41, 718-724, 2005 | 30 | 2005 |
| Polls and elections: Do the presidential primary debates matter? Measuring candidate speaking time and audience response during the 2012 primaries PA Stewart Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (2), 361-381, 2015 | 28 | 2015 |
| The invisible hands of political parties in presidential elections: Party activists and political aggregation from 2004 to 2012 A Dowdle, S Limbocker, S Yang, K Sebold, P Stewart Springer, 2013 | 24 | 2013 |
| The personalization of campaigns: Nonverbal cues in presidential debates EP Bucy, P Stewart Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2018 | 22 | 2018 |
| Presidential laugh lines: Candidate display behavior and audience laughter in the 2008 primary debates PA Stewart Politics and the Life Sciences 29 (2), 55-72, 2010 | 20 | 2010 |
| “Please clap”: Applause, laughter, and booing during the 2016 GOP presidential primary debates PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, J Miller PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4), 696-700, 2016 | 19 | 2016 |
| Fear and hope over the third generation of agricultural biotechnology: Analysis of public response in the Federal Register PA Stewart, W McLean AgBioForum, 2004 | 19 | 2004 |
| Political humor in a changing media landscape: A new generation of research M Boukes, J Compton, RG Dye, S Edgerly, AD Eubanks, SJ Farnsworth, ... Rowman & Littlefield, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
| Candidate performance and observable audience response: Laughter and applause–cheering during the first 2016 Clinton–Trump presidential debate PA Stewart, AD Eubanks, RG Dye, ZH Gong, EP Bucy, RH Wicks, ... Frontiers in psychology 9, 1182, 2018 | 18 | 2018 |
Austin D. EubanksOffice of Innovation for Education, University of Arkansas在 uark.edu 的电子邮件经过验证
