| Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment J Spaapen, L Van Drooge Research evaluation 20 (3), 211-218, 2011 | 628 | 2011 |
| Evaluating research in context: A method for comprehensive assessment J Spaapen, H Dijstelbloem, F Wamelink Consultative committee of sector councils for research and development (COS), 2007 | 137 | 2007 |
| Productive interactions: Societal impact of academic research in the knowledge society W Van den Akker, J Spaapen, K Maes LERU position paper, 2017 | 60 | 2017 |
| Evaluating research in context J Spaapen, H Dijstelbloem, F Wamelink A method for comprehensive assessment, 2nd edition, The Hague: COS, 2007 | 54 | 2007 |
| Evaluation and monitoring of transdisciplinary collaborations L van Drooge, J Spaapen The Journal of Technology Transfer 47 (3), 747-761, 2022 | 51 | 2022 |
| Indicators for promoting and monitoring responsible research and innovation. Report from the expert group on policy indicators for responsible research and innovation R Strand, J Spaapen, MW Bauer, E Hogan, G Revuelta, S Stagl, L Paula, ... European Commission-Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2015 | 49 | 2015 |
| From the bottom up P Maassen, O Kallioinen, P Keränen, M Penttinen, J Spaapen, ... Evaluation of RDI activities of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences …, 2012 | 43 | 2012 |
| Indicators for promoting and monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation R Strand, J Spaapen, MW Bauer, E Hogan, G Revuelta, S Stagl, L Paula, ... Report from the expert group on policy indicators for responsible research …, 2015 | 41 | 2015 |
| Science and technology in a developing world T Shinn, J Spaapen, VV Krishna Springer Science & Business Media, 2013 | 35 | 2013 |
| Assessing societal impact of SSH in an engaging world: focus on productive interaction, creative pathways and enhanced visibility of SSH research J Spaapen, G Sivertsen Research Evaluation 29 (1), 1-3, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
| Valorizing SSH research: Towards a new approach to evaluate SSH research’value for society I Galleron, M Ochsner, J Spaapen, G Williams fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation 44, 35-41, 2017 | 18 | 2017 |
| Social impact assessment methods for research and funding instruments through the study of productive interactions between science and society K Barker, D Cox, J Spaapen, B Van der Meulen, JM Gallert, T Sveinsdottir European Commission, 2011 | 18 | 2011 |
| SIAMPI final report J Spaapen, L Van Drooge, T Propp, B Van der Meulen, T Shinn, ... URL: http://www. siampi. eu/Pages/SIA/Content/SIAMPI_Final% 20report. pdf …, 2011 | 17 | 2011 |
| Evaluation of Research in Context A Quick Scan of an Emerging Field F Merkx, I Van Der Weijden, AM Oostveen, P Van Den Besselaar, ... Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut/ERiC, 2007 | 15 | 2007 |
| Locomotive breath? Post festum reflections on the EC Expert Group on policy indicators for responsible research and innovation R Strand, J Spaapen Assessment of Responsible Innovation, 42-59, 2020 | 14 | 2020 |
| Improving pathways to interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research for the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: first lessons from the SHAPE-ID project–Policy Brief B Vienni Baptista, C Lyall, J Ohlmeyer, J Spaapen, D Wallace, C Pohl Policy Brief. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo 3824954, 2020 | 12 | 2020 |
| The evaluation of university research. A method for the incorporation of the societal value of research. J Spaapen, F Wamelink | 12 | 1999 |
| QRiH: towards a fitting system for humanities research evaluation A Prins, J Spaapen, T van Leeuwen, N van den Broek-Honingh Fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 91-98, 2019 | 10 | 2019 |
| Mutual Learning Exercise: Performance-based funding of university research K Debackere, E Arnold, G Sivertsen, J Spaapen, D Sturn Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, B-1049 …, 2018 | 10 | 2018 |
| Serving variegated audiences: From ranking oriented evaluation to mission oriented evaluation AAM Prins, J Spaapen fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation 44, 42-49, 2017 | 10 | 2017 |
