The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods DJ Street, L Burgess John Wiley & Sons, 2007 | 784 | 2007 |
Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments DJ Street, L Burgess, JJ Louviere International journal of research in marketing 22 (4), 459-470, 2005 | 697 | 2005 |
Combinatorics of experimental design AP Street, DJ Street Oxford University Press, Inc., 1986 | 427 | 1986 |
Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information JJ Louviere, D Street, L Burgess, N Wasi, T Islam, AAJ Marley Journal of choice modelling 1 (1), 128-164, 2008 | 343 | 2008 |
Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price? JJ Louviere, T Islam, N Wasi, D Street, L Burgess Journal of Consumer Research 35 (2), 360-375, 2008 | 306 | 2008 |
Dissecting the random component of utility J Louviere, D Street, R Carson, A Ainslie, JR DeShazo, T Cameron, ... Marketing letters 13, 177-193, 2002 | 292 | 2002 |
Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia R Viney, R Norman, MT King, P Cronin, DJ Street, S Knox, J Ratcliffe Value in Health 14 (6), 928-936, 2011 | 270 | 2011 |
Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes L Burgess, DJ Street Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 134 (1), 288-301, 2005 | 211 | 2005 |
International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis R Norman, P Cronin, R Viney, M King, D Street, J Ratcliffe Value in Health 12 (8), 1194-1200, 2009 | 185 | 2009 |
Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments DJ Street, L Burgess Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 118 (1-2), 185-199, 2004 | 166 | 2004 |
Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients’ preferences K Gerard, C Salisbury, D Street, C Pope, H Baxter Journal of health services research & policy 13 (2_suppl), 3-10, 2008 | 143 | 2008 |
An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ‐5D health states R Viney, R Norman, J Brazier, P Cronin, MT King, J Ratcliffe, D Street Health Economics 23 (6), 729-742, 2014 | 137 | 2014 |
Optimal designs for 2 k choice experiments L Burgess, DJ Street Taylor & Francis Group 32 (11), 2185-2206, 2003 | 134 | 2003 |
Valuing SF-6D health states using a discrete choice experiment R Norman, R Viney, J Brazier, L Burgess, P Cronin, M King, J Ratcliffe, ... Medical Decision Making 34 (6), 773-786, 2014 | 122 | 2014 |
The Elgar companion to health economics AM Jones Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012 | 118 | 2012 |
Optimal designs for 2 k paired comparison experiments DJ Street, DS Bunch, BJ Moore Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 30 (10), 2149-2171, 2001 | 106 | 2001 |
Does mode of administration matter? Comparison of online and face-to-face administration of a time trade-off task R Norman, MT King, D Clarke, R Viney, P Cronin, D Street Quality of Life Research 19, 499-508, 2010 | 104 | 2010 |
Australian utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 MT King, R Viney, A Simon Pickard, D Rowen, NK Aaronson, JE Brazier, ... Pharmacoeconomics 36, 225-238, 2018 | 96 | 2018 |
Stated-preference methods JJ Louviere, D Street Hensher, DA und Button, K.(Ed.), Handbook of transport modelling 1, 131-143, 2000 | 90 | 2000 |
Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format R Norman, R Viney, NK Aaronson, JE Brazier, D Cella, DSJ Costa, ... Quality of Life Research 25, 637-649, 2016 | 72 | 2016 |