Agenda setting in the Supreme Court: The collision of policy and jurisprudence RC Black, RJ Owens The Journal of Politics 71 (3), 1062-1075, 2009 | 222 | 2009 |
The solicitor general and the United States Supreme Court: Executive influence and judicial decisions RC Black, RJ Owens New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012 | 163 | 2012 |
Empirical Analysis of the Length of US Supreme Court Opinions, An RC Black, JF Spriggs Hous. L. Rev. 45, 621, 2008 | 132 | 2008 |
The citation and depreciation of US Supreme Court precedent RC Black, JF Spriggs Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2), 325-358, 2013 | 120 | 2013 |
Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making RC Black, SA Treul, TR Johnson, J Goldman Journal of Politics 73 (2), 572-581, 2011 | 113 | 2011 |
US Supreme Court opinions and their audiences RC Black, RJ Owens, J Wedeking, PC Wohlfarth Cambridge University Press, 2016 | 95 | 2016 |
Courting the president: how circuit court judges alter their behavior for promotion to the Supreme Court RC Black, RJ Owens American Journal of Political Science 60 (1), 30-43, 2016 | 88 | 2016 |
Inquiring minds want to know: Do justices tip their hands with questions at oral argument in the US supreme court TR Johnson, RC Black, J Goldman, SA Treul Wash. UJL & Pol'y 29, 241, 2009 | 80 | 2009 |
US Supreme Court agenda setting and the role of litigant status RC Black, CL Boyd The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 28 (2), 286-312, 2012 | 78 | 2012 |
Adding Recess Appointments to the President's “Tool Chest” of Unilateral Powers RC Black, AJ Madonna, RJ Owens, MS Lynch Political Research Quarterly 60 (4), 645-654, 2007 | 73 | 2007 |
Oral arguments and coalition formation on the US Supreme Court: A deliberate dialogue RC Black, TR Johnson, J Wedeking University of Michigan Press, 2012 | 71 | 2012 |
Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the United States Supreme Court RC Black, RJ Owens Political Research Quarterly, 2011 | 70 | 2011 |
The influence of public sentiment on Supreme Court opinion clarity RC Black, RJ Owens, J Wedeking, PC Wohlfarth Law & Society Review 50 (3), 703-732, 2016 | 65 | 2016 |
The role of emotional language in briefs before the US Supreme Court RC Black, MEK Hall, RJ Owens, EM Ringsmuth Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2), 377-407, 2016 | 58 | 2016 |
A built-in advantage: The office of the Solicitor General and the US Supreme Court RC Black, RJ Owens Political Research Quarterly 66 (2), 454-466, 2013 | 56 | 2013 |
Toward an actor-based measure of Supreme Court case salience: Information-seeking and engagement during oral arguments RC Black, MW Sorenson, TR Johnson Political Research Quarterly 66 (4), 804-818, 2013 | 54 | 2013 |
Pardon the Interruption: An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Justices' Behavior During Oral Arguments TR Johnson, RC Black, J Wedeking Loy. L. Rev. 55, 331, 2009 | 54 | 2009 |
Recusals and the problem of an equally divided supreme court R Black, L Epstein J. App. Prac. & Process 7, 75, 2005 | 52 | 2005 |
Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench TR Johnson, RC Black, EM Ringsmuth Minn. L. Rev. 93, 1560, 2008 | 51 | 2008 |
Consider the source (and the message) Supreme Court justices and strategic audits of lower court decisions RC Black, RJ Owens Political Research Quarterly 65 (2), 385-395, 2012 | 49 | 2012 |