Interviewing the interviewers: Journalistic norms and racial diversity in the newsroom KA Nishikawa, TL Towner, RA Clawson, EN Waltenburg The Howard Journal of Communications 20 (3), 242-259, 2009 | 123 | 2009 |
The legitimacy-conferring authority of the US Supreme Court: An experimental design RA Clawson, ER Kegler, EN Waltenburg American Politics Research 29 (6), 566-591, 2001 | 105 | 2001 |
Support for a Supreme Court affirmative action decision: a story in black and white RA Clawson, EN Waltenburg American Politics Research 31 (3), 251-279, 2003 | 81 | 2003 |
Why Do Interest Groups Engage the Judiciary? Policy Wishes and Structural Needs* RS Solberg, EN Waltenburg Social Science Quarterly 87 (3), 558-572, 2006 | 70 | 2006 |
Litigating Federalism B Swinford, EN Waltenburg Bloomsbury Publishing, 1999 | 66 | 1999 |
Framing Supreme Court decisions: The mainstream versus the Black press RA Clawson, HCN Strine IV, EN Waltenburg Journal of Black Studies 33 (6), 784-800, 2003 | 63 | 2003 |
Tort decisions and campaign dollars EN Waltenburg, CS Lopeman Southeastern Political Review 28 (2), 241-263, 2000 | 63 | 2000 |
Policy making in an independent judiciary: The Norwegian supreme court G Grendstad, WR Shaffer, EN Waltenburg ECPR Press, 2015 | 51 | 2015 |
Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court RA Clawson, R Clawson, E Waltenburg Temple University Press, 2008 | 43 | 2008 |
The media, the court, and the misrepresentation: The new myth of the court RS Solberg, EN Waltenburg Routledge, 2014 | 41 | 2014 |
Revealed Preferences of Norwegian Supreme Court Justices G Grendstad, WR Shaffer, EN Waltenburg Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap 123 (1), 73-101, 2010 | 30 | 2010 |
Supreme court justices’ economic behaviour: a multilevel model analysis JK Skiple, G Grendstad, WR Shaffer, EN Waltenburg Scandinavian Political Studies 39 (1), 73-94, 2016 | 27 | 2016 |
The Supreme Court as a policy arena: The strategies and tactics of state attorneys general EN Waltenburg, B Swinford Policy Studies Journal 27 (2), 242-259, 1999 | 24 | 1999 |
When justices disagree. The influence of ideology and geography on economic voting on the norwegian supreme court G Grendstad, WR Shaffer, EN Waltenburg Retfaerd 34, 3-22, 2011 | 23 | 2011 |
Supreme Court legitimacy and group-centric forces: black support for capital punishment and affirmative action RA Clawson, ER Kegler, EN Waltenburg Political Behavior 25, 289-311, 2003 | 20 | 2003 |
Ideologi og grunnholdninger hos dommerne i Norges Høyesterett G Grendstad, WR Shaffer, EN Waltenburg Lov og rett 51 (4), 240-253, 2012 | 16 | 2012 |
The Supreme Court and the States: Do Lopez and Printz Represent a Broader Pro-State Movement B Swinford, EN Waltenburg JL & Pol. 14, 319, 1998 | 16 | 1998 |
Reform interrupted? State innovation, court decisions, and the past and future of campaign finance reform in the States C Kulesza, C Witko, E Waltenburg Election Law Journal 15 (2), 143-159, 2016 | 15 | 2016 |
Proactive and powerful: Law clerks and the institutionalization of the Norwegian Supreme Court G Grendstad, EN Waltenburg, J Øyrehagen Sunde, W R Shaffer Koninklijke Boom uitgevers, 2019 | 14 | 2019 |
Understanding the language of political agreement and disagreement in legislative texts M Davoodi, E Waltenburg, D Goldwasser Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational …, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |