How to determine the quality of students’ reflections? Ä Leijen, K Valtna, DAJ Leijen, M Pedaste Studies in Higher Education 37 (2), 203-217, 2012 | 219 | 2012 |
A novel approach to examine the impact of web-based peer review on the revisions of L2 writers DAJ Leijen Computers and Composition 43, 35-54, 2017 | 53 | 2017 |
Linguistic and review features of peer feedback and their effect on the implementation of changes in academic writing: A corpus based investigation DAJ Leijen, A Leontjeva Journal of Writing Research 4 (2), 178-202, 2012 | 32 | 2012 |
Doctoral students’ research stall: Supervisors’ perceptions and intervention strategies L Lepp, M Remmik, Ä Leijen, DAJ Leijen Sage Open 6 (3), 2158244016659116, 2016 | 24 | 2016 |
Applying machine learning techniques to investigate the influence of peer feedback on the writing process. DAJ Leijen Methods in Writing Process Research 13, 167-183, 2014 | 16 | 2014 |
Affective Language in Student Peer Reviews: Exploring Data from Three Institutional Contexts A Kauppinen, L Aull, D Leijen, J Moxley, A Wärnsby Journal of Academic Writing; 1 8, 2018 | 10 | 2018 |
The affect and effect of asynchronous written feedback comments on the peer feedback process: An ethnographic case-study approach within one L2 English doctorate writing group R Yallop, P Taremaa, D Leijen Journal of Writing Research 12 (3), 531-594, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
Factorial structure of SILL revisited: Adaptation of SILL for Estonian EFL learners K Saks, DAJ Leijen, K Õun, K Täht Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat 11, 241-261, 2015 | 8 | 2015 |
The perceived effectiveness of written peer feedback comments within L2 English academic writing courses RMA Yallop, DAJ Leijen Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat 14, 247-271, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
Using author-devised cover letters instead of instructor-devised rubrics to generate useful written peer feedback comments R Yallop, DAJ Leijen Journal of Academic Writing 11 (1), 16-44, 2021 | 6 | 2021 |
Centralised support for writing, research, learning and teaching: case studies of existing models across Europe I O’Sullivan, G Dobravac, A Farrell, A Kacmarova, D Leijen COST Action 15221: We ReLaTe, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
Advancing writing research: an investigation of the effects of web-based peer review on second language writing DAJ Leijen University of Tartu, 2016 | 5 | 2016 |
University teachers and students' perspectives on academic writing: a case from a university in estonia D Leijen, A Jürine, I Tragel EDULEARN15 Proceedings, 7768-7776, 2015 | 5 | 2015 |
Lithuanian academic discourse revisited: Features and patterns of scientific communication A Ruskan, H Hint, DAJ Leijen, J Šinkūnienė Open Linguistics 9 (1), 20220231, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
Academic writing in the Baltic States: Introducing the Bwrite project A Jürine, D Leijen, H Hint, D Laiveniece, J Šinkūnienė, C Johansson, ... educare, 27-37, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
Tagasiside kirjutamisprotsessis A Jürine, DAJ Leijen, I Tragel Oma Keel, 17-24, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
Investigating the Revision Process in a Web-based Peer Review System Using Machine Learning D Leijen EDULEARN15 Proceedings, 5616-5623, 2015 | 2 | 2015 |
Cross-linguistic patterns of metadiscourse: Disciplinary similarities and section-based differences DAJ Leijen, H Hint, H Lemendik, B Egle, A Ruskan, C Johansson Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat 20, 115-132, 2024 | | 2024 |
BWRITE: Academic Writing in the Baltic States: Rhetorical Structures through culture (s) and languages. M Susman, H Hint, N Groom, D Leijen University of Tartu, 2022 | | 2022 |
Eestikeelse akadeemilise teksti tunnustest H Hint, DAJ Leijen, A Jürine Keel ja Kirjandus 2022 (4), 2022 | | 2022 |