| Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force JFP Bridges, AB Hauber, D Marshall, A Lloyd, LA Prosser, DA Regier, ... Value in health 14 (4), 403-413, 2011 | 1814 | 2011 |
| Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force AB Hauber, JM González, CGM Groothuis-Oudshoorn, T Prior, ... Value in health 19 (4), 300-315, 2016 | 1130 | 2016 |
| Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008 D Marshall, JFP Bridges, B Hauber, R Cameron, L Donnalley, K Fyie, ... The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3, 249-256, 2010 | 370 | 2010 |
| Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making MP Ho, JM Gonzalez, HP Lerner, CY Neuland, JM Whang, ... Surgical endoscopy 29 (10), 2984-2993, 2015 | 233 | 2015 |
| Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand GR Parsons, AB Hauber Land economics, 32-48, 1998 | 207 | 1998 |
| Treatment preferences and medication adherence of people with Type 2 diabetes using oral glucose‐lowering agents AB Hauber, AF Mohamed, FR Johnson, H Falvey Diabetic medicine 26 (4), 416-424, 2009 | 193 | 2009 |
| Factors that affect adherence to bipolar disorder treatments: a stated-preference approach FR Johnson, S Özdemir, R Manjunath, AB Hauber, SP Burch, ... Medical care 45 (6), 545-552, 2007 | 180 | 2007 |
| Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care S Özdemir, FR Johnson, AB Hauber Journal of health economics 28 (4), 894-901, 2009 | 163 | 2009 |
| Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis JFP Bridges, AF Mohamed, HW Finnern, A Woehl, AB Hauber Lung Cancer 77 (1), 224-231, 2012 | 154 | 2012 |
| Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability? EM Janssen, DA Marshall, AB Hauber, JFP Bridges Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research 17 (6), 531-542, 2017 | 131 | 2017 |
| Quantifying benefit–risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature A Brett Hauber, AO Fairchild, F Reed Johnson Applied health economics and health policy 11, 319-329, 2013 | 131 | 2013 |
| A framework for incorporating patient preferences regarding benefits and risks into regulatory assessment of medical technologies M Ho, A Saha, KK McCleary, B Levitan, S Christopher, K Zandlo, ... Value in health 19 (6), 746-750, 2016 | 122 | 2016 |
| Patient preference methods—a patient centered evaluation paradigm J Bridges, E Onukwugha, FR Johnson, AB Hauber ISPOR connections 13 (6), 4-7, 2007 | 99 | 2007 |
| Potential savings in the cost of caring for Alzheimer’s disease: treatment with rivastigmine AB Hauber, JA Mauskopf, EH Snyder Pharmacoeconomics 18, 609-612, 2000 | 96 | 2000 |
| A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients' willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis AB Hauber, NK Arden, AF Mohamed, FR Johnson, PM Peloso, DJ Watson, ... Osteoarthritis and cartilage 21 (2), 289-297, 2013 | 93 | 2013 |
| Savings in the cost of caring for patients with Alzheimer's disease in Canada: an analysis of treatment with rivastigmine AB Hauber, A Gnanasakthy, JA Mauskopf Clinical therapeutics 22 (4), 439-451, 2000 | 87 | 2000 |
| Are gastroenterologists less tolerant of treatment risks than patients? Benefit-risk preferences in Crohn's disease management FR Johnson, B Hauber, CA Siegel, S Hass, BE Sands Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 16 (8), 616-628, 2010 | 86 | 2010 |
| Stated preferences of patients with cancer for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains during treatment D Osoba, MA Hsu, C Copley-Merriman, J Coombs, FR Johnson, ... Quality of Life Research 15, 273-283, 2006 | 84 | 2006 |
| Eliciting benefit–risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis G Van Houtven, FR Johnson, V Kilambi, AB Hauber Medical Decision Making 31 (3), 469-480, 2011 | 81 | 2011 |
| Peer reviewed: stated preference for cancer screening: a systematic review of the literature, 1990–2013 C Mansfield, FKL Tangka, DU Ekwueme, JL Smith, GP Guy Jr, C Li, ... Preventing chronic disease 13, 2016 | 77 | 2016 |
