| Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? D Pijpops, F Van de Velde Folia Linguistica 50 (2), 543-581, 2016 | 87 | 2016 |
| A multivariate analysis of the partitive genitive in Dutch. Bringing quantitative data into a theoretical discussion D Pijpops, F Van de Velde Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory 14 (1), 1-33, 2018 | 46 | 2018 |
| The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic An agent-based model D Pijpops, K Beuls, F Van de Velde Computational linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 5, 81-102, 2015 | 44 | 2015 |
| Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax: Four case studies D Pijpops, I De Smet, F Van de Velde Constructions and frames 10 (2), 269-305, 2018 | 38 | 2018 |
| What is an alternation?: Six answers D Pijpops Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 (1), 283-294, 2020 | 37 | 2020 |
| Alternating argument constructions of Dutch psychological verbs: A theory-driven corpus investigation D Pijpops, D Speelman Folia Linguistica 51 (1), 207-251, 2017 | 30 | 2017 |
| Comparing explanations for the Complexity Principle: evidence from argument realization D Pijpops, D Speelman, S Grondelaers, F Van de Velde Language and Cognition 10 (3), 514-543, 2018 | 27 | 2018 |
| Where, how and why does argument structure vary? A usage-based investigation into the Dutch transitive-prepositional alternation D Pijpops | 26 | 2019 |
| Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing D Pijpops, D Speelman, F Van de Velde, S Grondelaers Cognitive Linguistics 32 (3), 487-528, 2021 | 16 | 2021 |
| Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde 2018 Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax D Pijpops Four case studies. Constructions and Frames10 (2), 269-305, 0 | 13* | |
| Ethnolect speakers and Dutch partitive adjectival inflection: A corpus analysis D Pijpops, F Van de Velde Taal en Tongval 67 (2), 343-371, 2015 | 12 | 2015 |
| Investigating lexical effects in syntax with regularized regression (Lasso). F Van de Velde, D Pijpops Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 2021 | 11 | 2021 |
| Agent-gebaseerde modellering in de historische taalkunde: Een model van regularisatiedruk op de Nederlandse werkwoorden D Pijpops, K Beuls Handelingen-Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse maatschappij voor taal-en …, 2014 | 11 | 2014 |
| Grensoverschrijdend syntactisch gedrag F Van de Velde, D Pijpops UGent, Vakgroep Taalkunde, Afdeling Nederlands; Gent, 2018 | 10 | 2018 |
| How, Why and Where Does Argument Structure Vary? D Pijpops A usage-based investigation into the Dutch transitive–prepositional …, 2019 | 9 | 2019 |
| Lectal contamination. How language-external variation becomes language-internal through language contact D Pijpops, F Van de Velde Variationist Linguistics meets Contact Linguistics, Date: 2018/05/21-2018/05 …, 2018 | 8 | 2018 |
| How redundant is language really? Agent-recipient disambiguation across time and space D Pijpops, E Zehentner Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7 (1), 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| Lectal contamination: Evidence from corpora and from agent-based simulation D Pijpops International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27 (3), 259-290, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| Reassembling the pimped ride: A quantitative look at the integration of a borrowed expression S De Pascale, D Pijpops, F Van de Velde, E Zenner Frontiers in Communication 7, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| Argument alternations of the Dutch psych verbs. A corpus investigation D Pijpops, D Speelman 6th Conference on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics (QITL), 2015 | 5* | 2015 |
