| The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos J Savulescu, J Pugh, T Douglas, C Gyngell Protein & cell 6 (7), 476-479, 2015 | 145 | 2015 |
| Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data T Douglas, J Pugh, I Singh, J Savulescu, S Fazel European psychiatry 42, 134-137, 2017 | 137 | 2017 |
| Deep brain stimulation, authenticity and value J Pugh, H Maslen, J Savulescu Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 26 (4), 640-657, 2017 | 63 | 2017 |
| Considerations and methods for placebo controls in surgical trials (ASPIRE guidelines) DJ Beard, MK Campbell, JM Blazeby, AJ Carr, C Weijer, BH Cuthbertson, ... The Lancet 395 (10226), 828-838, 2020 | 62 | 2020 |
| The ethics of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of anorexia nervosa H Maslen, J Pugh, J Savulescu Neuroethics 8 (3), 215-230, 2015 | 60* | 2015 |
| Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies J Pugh Journal of medical ethics 42 (9), 578-581, 2016 | 59 | 2016 |
| Autonomy, rationality, and contemporary bioethics J Pugh Oxford University Press, 2020 | 55 | 2020 |
| Brainjacking in deep brain stimulation and autonomy J Pugh, L Pycroft, A Sandberg, T Aziz, J Savulescu Ethics and Information Technology 20, 219-232, 2018 | 52 | 2018 |
| Balancing incentives and disincentives for vaccination in a pandemic J Savulescu, J Pugh, D Wilkinson Nature Medicine 27 (9), 1500-1503, 2021 | 37 | 2021 |
| Clarifying the normative significance of ‘personality changes’ following deep brain stimulation J Pugh Science and engineering ethics 26, 1655-1680, 2020 | 30 | 2020 |
| Unexpected complications of novel deep brain stimulation treatments: ethical issues and clinical recommendations H Maslen, B Cheeran, J Pugh, L Pycroft, S Boccard, S Prangnell, ... Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 21 (2), 135-143, 2018 | 30 | 2018 |
| Justifications for non-consensual medical intervention: From infectious disease control to criminal rehabilitation J Pugh, T Douglas Criminal justice ethics 35 (3), 205-229, 2016 | 30 | 2016 |
| The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity J Pugh, J Savulescu, RCH Brown, D Wilkinson Journal of medical ethics 48 (6), 371-377, 2022 | 28 | 2022 |
| No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation J Pugh Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (4), 225-230, 2019 | 28 | 2019 |
| Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re‐examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate J Pugh Bioethics 29 (3), 145-152, 2015 | 25 | 2015 |
| Evidence-based Neuroethics, deep brain stimulation and personality-deflating, but not bursting, the bubble J Pugh, L Pycroft, H Maslen, T Aziz, J Savulescu Neuroethics 14, 27-38, 2021 | 24 | 2021 |
| Cohen’s conservatism and human enhancement J Pugh, G Kahane, J Savulescu The journal of Ethics 17 (4), 331-354, 2013 | 22 | 2013 |
| Coercive paternalism and back-door perfectionism J Pugh Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5), 350-351, 2014 | 21 | 2014 |
| Bioconservatism, partiality, and the human-nature objection to enhancement J Pugh, G Kahane, J Savulescu The Monist 99 (4), 406-422, 2016 | 20 | 2016 |
| Lay attitudes toward deception in medicine: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence J Pugh, G Kahane, H Maslen, J Savulescu AJOB empirical bioethics 7 (1), 31-38, 2016 | 20 | 2016 |
