作者
Wim Notebaert, Femke Houtman, Filip Van Opstal, Wim Gevers, Wim Fias, Tom Verguts
发表日期
2009/5/1
期刊
Cognition
卷号
111
期号
2
页码范围
275-279
出版商
Elsevier
简介
It is generally assumed that slowing after errors is a cognitive control effect reflecting more careful response strategies after errors. However, clinical data are not compatible with this explanation. We therefore consider two alternative explanations, one referring to the possibility of a persisting underlying problem and one on the basis of the low frequency of errors (orienting account). This latter hypothesis argues that infrequent events orient attention away from the task. Support for the orienting account was obtained in two experiments. Using a new experimental procedure, Experiment 1 demonstrated post-error slowing after infrequent errors and post-correct slowing after infrequent correct trials. In Experiment 2, slowing was observed following infrequent irrelevant tones replacing the feedback signals.
引用总数
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320244113754525032483953473948645122
学术搜索中的文章
W Notebaert, F Houtman, F Van Opstal, W Gevers… - Cognition, 2009