… As a result, we think phylogenetic systematics bridges the disciplines of … biology, ecology,
evolution, and systematics. Indeed, it is our contention that phylogenetic systematics is the …

… as practiced bymorphological systematists, who … systematics and comparative biology. I
first provide an overview ofcommon methodologies for dealing with polymorphism in phylogeny …

… theoretical basis of objective data analysis. The same basic laws of systematics are valid for
both comparative … It is the intention of this book to present a comparison and synthesis of the …

… Hennig's definitions are generally excellent within his set of basic premises, and point out …
in conventional phylogenetic systematics. Under the heading of phylogenetic systematics exist …

… or evaluate phylogenetic hypotheses. This is understandable because comparative biologists
realize that similarity is used to form groups within groups; to most functional biologists, …

… for use as terminal units in phylogenetic analysis oforganismal relationships. … phylogenetic
systematics but that no one species concept can meet the needs of all comparative biologists. …

… that working systematists will be able to understand the basics we … comparative biologists
practice systematics, even though all comparative data can be accommodated by systematics. …

… + automated DNA barcoding + molecular phylogeny, which we consider to be nothing but a
… that biologists who need systematists can circumvent this dependency by ‘doing systematics …

… that phylogenetic systematics is the … basic methods involved in phylogenetic systematics
adapted largely from Wiley et al. (1991). More-advanced applications of phylogenetic systematic …

… using the principles of phylogenetic systematics (see de Queiroz, 1985). … phylogenetic
systematics, as well as comparative anatomy, paleontology, and, in fact, all of comparative biology…