A review of the most commonly used methods for sample collection in environmental surveillance of poliovirus

G Matrajt, B Naughton… - Clinical Infectious …, 2018 - academic.oup.com
G Matrajt, B Naughton, AS Bandyopadhyay, JS Meschke
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2018academic.oup.com
We performed a review of the environmental surveillance methods commonly used to collect
and concentrate poliovirus (PV) from water samples. We compared the sampling
approaches (trap vs grab), the process methods (precipitation vs filtration), and the various
tools and chemical reagents used to separate PV from other viruses and pathogens in water
samples (microporous glass, pads, polyethylene glycol [PEG]/dextran, PEG/sodium chloride,
NanoCeram/ViroCap, and ester membranes). The advantages and disadvantages of each …
Abstract
We performed a review of the environmental surveillance methods commonly used to collect and concentrate poliovirus (PV) from water samples. We compared the sampling approaches (trap vs grab), the process methods (precipitation vs filtration), and the various tools and chemical reagents used to separate PV from other viruses and pathogens in water samples (microporous glass, pads, polyethylene glycol [PEG]/dextran, PEG/sodium chloride, NanoCeram/ViroCap, and ester membranes). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are considered, and the geographical areas where they are currently used are discussed. Several methods have demonstrated the ability to concentrate and recover PVs from environmental samples. The details of the particular sampling conditions and locations should be considered carefully in method selection.
Oxford University Press
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果