Antiscience and ethical concerns associated with advocacy of Lyme disease

PG Auwaerter, JS Bakken, RJ Dattwyler… - The Lancet infectious …, 2011 - thelancet.com
PG Auwaerter, JS Bakken, RJ Dattwyler, JS Dumler, JJ Halperin, E McSweegan…
The Lancet infectious diseases, 2011thelancet.com
Advocacy for Lyme disease has become an increasingly important part of an antiscience
movement that denies both the viral cause of AIDS and the benefits of vaccines and that
supports unproven (sometimes dangerous) alternative medical treatments. Some activists
portray Lyme disease, a geographically limited tick-borne infection, as a disease that is
insidious, ubiquitous, difficult to diagnose, and almost incurable; they also propose that the
disease causes mainly non-specific symptoms that can be treated only with long-term …
Summary
Advocacy for Lyme disease has become an increasingly important part of an antiscience movement that denies both the viral cause of AIDS and the benefits of vaccines and that supports unproven (sometimes dangerous) alternative medical treatments. Some activists portray Lyme disease, a geographically limited tick-borne infection, as a disease that is insidious, ubiquitous, difficult to diagnose, and almost incurable; they also propose that the disease causes mainly non-specific symptoms that can be treated only with long-term antibiotics and other unorthodox and unvalidated treatments. Similar to other antiscience groups, these advocates have created a pseudoscientific and alternative selection of practitioners, research, and publications and have coordinated public protests, accused opponents of both corruption and conspiracy, and spurred legislative efforts to subvert evidence-based medicine and peer-reviewed science. The relations and actions of some activists, medical practitioners, and commercial bodies involved in Lyme disease advocacy pose a threat to public health.
thelancet.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果