[HTML][HTML] Comparing verbal autopsy cause of death findings as determined by physician coding and probabilistic modelling: a public health analysis of 54 000 deaths …

P Byass, K Herbst, E Fottrell, MM Ali… - Journal of global …, 2015 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
P Byass, K Herbst, E Fottrell, MM Ali, F Odhiambo, N Amek, MJ Hamel, KF Laserson, K Kahn…
Journal of global health, 2015ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background Coverage of civil registration and vital statistics varies globally, with most
deaths in Africa and Asia remaining either unregistered or registered without cause of death.
One important constraint has been a lack of fit–for–purpose tools for registering deaths and
assigning causes in situations where no doctor is involved. Verbal autopsy (interviewing
care–givers and witnesses to deaths and interpreting their information into causes of death)
is the only available solution. Automated interpretation of verbal autopsy data into cause of …
Abstract
Background
Coverage of civil registration and vital statistics varies globally, with most deaths in Africa and Asia remaining either unregistered or registered without cause of death. One important constraint has been a lack of fit–for–purpose tools for registering deaths and assigning causes in situations where no doctor is involved. Verbal autopsy (interviewing care–givers and witnesses to deaths and interpreting their information into causes of death) is the only available solution. Automated interpretation of verbal autopsy data into cause of death information is essential for rapid, consistent and affordable processing.
Methods
Verbal autopsy archives covering 54 182 deaths from five African and Asian countries were sourced on the basis of their geographical, epidemiological and methodological diversity, with existing physician–coded causes of death attributed. These data were unified into the WHO 2012 verbal autopsy standard format, and processed using the InterVA–4 model. Cause–specific mortality fractions from InterVA–4 and physician codes were calculated for each of 60 WHO 2012 cause categories, by age group, sex and source. Results from the two approaches were assessed for concordance and ratios of fractions by cause category. As an alternative metric, the Wilcoxon matched–pairs signed ranks test with two one–sided tests for stochastic equivalence was used.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果