Comparison of BCR-ABL1 quantification in peripheral blood and bone marrow using an International Scale-standardized assay for assessment of deep molecular …

G Greiner, F Ratzinger, M Gurbisz… - Clinical Chemistry and …, 2020 - degruyter.com
G Greiner, F Ratzinger, M Gurbisz, N Witzeneder, H Taghizadeh, SGK Mustafa…
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2020degruyter.com
Background Monitoring of molecular response (MR) using quantitative polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) for BCR-ABL1 is a pivotal tool for guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
and the long-term follow-up of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Results of MR
monitoring are standardized according to the International Scale (IS), and specific time-
dependent molecular milestones for definition of optimal response and treatment failure
have been included in treatment recommendations. The common practice to use peripheral …
Background
Monitoring of molecular response (MR) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BCR-ABL1 is a pivotal tool for guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and the long-term follow-up of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Results of MR monitoring are standardized according to the International Scale (IS), and specific time-dependent molecular milestones for definition of optimal response and treatment failure have been included in treatment recommendations. The common practice to use peripheral blood (PB) instead of bone marrow (BM) aspirate to monitor the MR monitoring in CML has been questioned. Some studies described differences between BCR-ABL1 levels in paired PB and BM specimens.
Methods
We examined 631 paired PB and BM samples from 283 CML patients in a retrospective single-center study using an IS normalized quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR assay for quantification of BCR-ABL1IS.
Results
A good overall concordance of BCR-ABL1IS results was found, a systematic tendency towards higher BCR-ABL1IS levels in PB was observed in samples of CML patients in a major MR. This difference was most pronounced in patients treated with imatinib for at least 1 year. Importantly, the difference resulted in a significantly lower rate of deep MR when BCR-ABL1IS was assessed in the PB compared to BM aspirates.
Conclusions
In summary, our data suggest that the classification of deep MR in patients with CML is more stringent in PB than in BM. Our study supports the current practice to primarily use PB for long-term molecular follow-up monitoring in CML.
De Gruyter
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果