[HTML][HTML] Editor's choice–type II endoleak: conservative management is a safe strategy

DA Sidloff, V Gokani, PW Stather, E Choke… - European Journal of …, 2014 - Elsevier
DA Sidloff, V Gokani, PW Stather, E Choke, MJ Bown, RD Sayers
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2014Elsevier
Objective Type II endoleak is the most common complication after endovascular abdominal
aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR); however, its natural history is unclear. The aim of this study
was to examine the incidence and outcomes of type II endoleak, at a single institution after
EVAR. Methods A total of 904 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR between
September 1995 and July 2013 at a single centre were entered onto a prospective
database. All patients were followed up by duplex ultrasound (DUSS). Patients who …
Objective
Type II endoleak is the most common complication after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR); however, its natural history is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and outcomes of type II endoleak, at a single institution after EVAR.
Methods
A total of 904 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR between September 1995 and July 2013 at a single centre were entered onto a prospective database. All patients were followed up by duplex ultrasound (DUSS). Patients who developed type II endoleak were compared for preoperative demographics, mortality, and sac expansion.
Results
A total of 175(19%) patients developed type II endoleak over a median follow-up of 3.6 years (1.5–5.9 years); 54% of type II endoleaks spontaneously resolved within 6 months (0.25–1.2 years). No difference was found in preoperative demographics or choice of endograft between the two groups. Survival was significantly higher in the group with type II endoleak (94.1% vs. 85.6%; p = .01) and this effect was most pronounced in those with late type II endoleaks (97.7% vs. 85.6% p = .004). No difference was seen in aneurysm-related mortality or rate of type I endoleak between the two groups. Freedom from sac expansion (>5 mm from preoperative diameter) was significantly lower in the group of patients with type II endoleak (82.5% vs. 93.2%, p = .0001); however, at a threshold of >10 mm from preoperative diameter no difference was seen.
Conclusions
Patients with isolated type II endoleak demonstrate equivalent aneurysm-related mortality and an improved survival.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果