The role of academic psychiatry faculty in the treatment and subsequent evaluation and promotion of medical students: an ethical conundrum

MG Kavan, PJ Malin, DR Wilson - Academic Psychiatry, 2008 - Springer
MG Kavan, PJ Malin, DR Wilson
Academic Psychiatry, 2008•Springer
Objectives This article explores ethical and practical issues associated with the Liaison
Committee on Medical Education (LCME) provision that states health professionals who
provide psychiatric/psychological care to medical students must have no involvement in the
academic evaluation or promotion of students receiving those services. Method The authors
address the pros and cons of this provision as they relate to the overall well-being of the
student. Results Arguments in support of this provision include students' desire for …
Objectives
This article explores ethical and practical issues associated with the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) provision that states health professionals who provide psychiatric/psychological care to medical students must have no involvement in the academic evaluation or promotion of students receiving those services.
Method
The authors address the pros and cons of this provision as they relate to the overall well-being of the student.
Results
Arguments in support of this provision include students’ desire for confidentiality, avoidance of dual-relationships, and fear of documentation in the academic record. Arguments against this provision include the elimination of student autonomy to select a psychiatrist, the suitability and accessibility of academic psychiatrists to treat students and the delimiting nature of this standard.
Conclusion
In general, the LCME provision eliminates potential barriers to the mental health treatment of medical students. However, research and debate on its impact and appropriateness on a case-by-case basis should continue.
Springer
展开收起
被引用次数：10 相关文章 所有 10 个版本
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果