Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A Madani, B Namazi, MS Altieri, DA Hashimoto… - Annals of …, 2022 - journals.lww.com
Annals of surgery, 2022journals.lww.com
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of artificial
intelligence (AI) models that can identify safe and dangerous zones of dissection, and
anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Summary Background
Data: Many adverse events during surgery occur due to errors in visual perception and
judgment leading to misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning, a subfield of AI, can
potentially be used to provide real-time guidance intraoperatively. Methods: Deep learning …
Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that can identify safe and dangerous zones of dissection, and anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Summary Background Data:
Many adverse events during surgery occur due to errors in visual perception and judgment leading to misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning, a subfield of AI, can potentially be used to provide real-time guidance intraoperatively.
Methods:
Deep learning models were developed and trained to identify safe (Go) and dangerous (No-Go) zones of dissection, liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle during LC. Annotations were performed by 4 high-volume surgeons. AI predictions were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation against annotations by expert surgeons. Primary outcomes were intersection-over-union (IOU) and F1 score (validated spatial correlation indices), and secondary outcomes were pixel-wise accuracy, sensitivity, specificity,±standard deviation.
Results:
AI models were trained on 2627 random frames from 290 LC videos, procured from 37 countries, 136 institutions, and 153 surgeons. Mean IOU, F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the AI to identify Go zones were 0.53 (±0.24), 0.70 (±0.28), 0.94 (±0.05), 0.69 (±0.20). and 0.94 (±0.03), respectively. For No-Go zones, these metrics were 0.71 (±0.29), 0.83 (±0.31), 0.95 (±0.06), 0.80 (±0.21), and 0.98 (±0.05), respectively. Mean IOU for identification of the liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle were: 0.86 (±0.12), 0.72 (±0.19), and 0.65 (±0.22), respectively.
Conclusions:
AI can be used to identify anatomy within the surgical field. This technology may eventually be used to provide real-time guidance and minimize the risk of adverse events.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果