Major health service transformation and the public voice: conflict, challenge or complicity?
Objectives Calls for major reconfigurations of health services have been accompanied by
recommendations that wide ranging stakeholders be involved. In particular, patients and the
wider public are seen as critical contributors as both funders and beneficiaries of public
health care. But public involvement is fraught with challenges, and little research has
focused on involvement in the health service transformation initiatives. This paper examines
the design and function of public involvement in reconfiguration of health services within the …
recommendations that wide ranging stakeholders be involved. In particular, patients and the
wider public are seen as critical contributors as both funders and beneficiaries of public
health care. But public involvement is fraught with challenges, and little research has
focused on involvement in the health service transformation initiatives. This paper examines
the design and function of public involvement in reconfiguration of health services within the …
Objectives
Calls for major reconfigurations of health services have been accompanied by recommendations that wide ranging stakeholders be involved. In particular, patients and the wider public are seen as critical contributors as both funders and beneficiaries of public health care. But public involvement is fraught with challenges, and little research has focused on involvement in the health service transformation initiatives. This paper examines the design and function of public involvement in reconfiguration of health services within the English NHS.
Methods
Qualitative data including interviews, observation and documents were collected in two health service ‘transformation’ programmes; interviews include involved public and professional participants. Data were analysed using parallel deductive and inductive approaches.
Results
Public involvement in the programmes was extensive but its terms of reference, and the individuals involved, were restricted by policy pressures and programme objectives. The degree to which participants descriptively or substantively represented the wider public was limited; participants sought to ‘speak for’ this public but their views on what was ‘acceptable’ and likely to influence decision-making led them to constrain their contributions.
Conclusions
Public involvement in two major service reconfiguration programmes in England was seen as important and functional, and could not be characterized as tokenistic. Yet involvement in these programmes fell short of normative ideals, and could inadvertently reduce, rather than enlarge, public influence on health service reconfiguration decisions.
Sage Journals以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果