Spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient-echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of …

SD Serai, JR Dillman, AT Trout - Radiology, 2017 - pubs.rsna.org
Radiology, 2017pubs.rsna.org
Purpose To compare two-dimensional (2D) gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo
(SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elastography for measurement of
hepatic stiffness in pediatric and young adult patients suspected of having liver disease.
Materials and Methods In this institutional review board–approved, HIPAA-compliant study,
58 patients underwent both 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography at 1.5 T during
separate breath holds. Liver stiffness (mean of means; in kilopascals) was measured by five …
Purpose
To compare two-dimensional (2D) gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elastography for measurement of hepatic stiffness in pediatric and young adult patients suspected of having liver disease.
Materials and Methods
In this institutional review board–approved, HIPAA-compliant study, 58 patients underwent both 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography at 1.5 T during separate breath holds. Liver stiffness (mean of means; in kilopascals) was measured by five blinded reviewers. Pooled mean liver stiffness and region-of-interest (ROI) size were compared by using paired t tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess agreement between techniques. Respiratory motion artifacts were compared across sequences by using the Fisher exact test.
Results
Mean patient age was 14.7 years ± 5.2 (standard deviation; age range, 0.7–20.5 years), and 55.2% (32 of 58) of patients were male. Mean liver stiffness was 2.92 kPa ± 1.29 measured at GRE MR elastography and 2.76 kPa ± 1.39 at SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P = .15). Mean ROI sizes were 8495 mm2 ± 4482 for 2D GRE MR elastography and 15 176 mm2 ± 7609 for 2D SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P < .001). Agreement was excellent for measured stiffness between five reviewers for both 2D GRE (ICC, 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.95, 0.98) and 2D SE-EPI (ICC, 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.99). Mean ICC (n = 5) for agreement between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography was 0.93 (range, 0.91–0.95). Moderate or severe breathing artifacts were observed on 27.5% (16 of 58) of 2D GRE images versus 0% 2D SE-EPI images (P < .001).
Conclusion
There is excellent agreement on measured hepatic stiffness between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography across multiple reviewers. SE-EPI MR elastography allowed for stiffness measurement across larger areas of the liver and can be performed in a single breath hold.
© RSNA, 2016
Radiological Society of North America
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果