Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted single-rooted anterior teeth were included in the
study and divided into two groups of 45 each. Biomechanical preparation was done with …

Aim: To compare and evaluate the cleaning ability of two reciprocating systems, that is,
WaveOne (WO) and self-adjusting files (SAF) in terms of removal of smear layer using …

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two instrumentation and
irrigant techniques in smear-layer removal from root canals. Methodology: Thirty single …

Objectives: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of three machine-assisted irrigation
systems in smear layer removal from apical one-third of the root canal system. Data Source …

Results: The four groups did not differ from each other in the coronal and mid-root parts of
the canal. In the apical part of the canal none of the methods could completely remove all …

AIM: This study comparatively evaluated the efficacy of Endovac irrigation system with
conventional needle irrigation in removing smear layer from the root canal. STUDY DESIGN …

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of
conventional needle irrigation delivery system, EndoActivator system, and EndoVac …

This study evaluated different irrigation methods in smear layer removal from the root canal
walls using maleic acid (MA). Maxillary anterior teeth (N= 30, n= 10 per group) were …

Aim: The aim of the following study is to compare the evaluation of different irrigation
activation system-F-File, CanalBrush (CB) and EndoActivator (EA) in removing smear layer …

Background/purpose Establishing effective irrigation methods is warranted to ensure the
predictability of minimally invasive root canal instrumentation. This study aimed to compare …