Colon cancer screening models: lessons and challenges

DF Ransohoff, M Pignone - Clinical Gastroenterology and …, 2013 - cghjournal.org
(CRC) screening, the best evidence would come from ran domized clinical trials that assess
head to head comparisons of different tests, test combinations, and time intervals for their …

[引用][C] 178 Evaluating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A collaborative modeling approach to inform the US preventive services task …

AG Zauber, AB Knudsen, R Carolyn, SK Naber… - Gastroenterology, 2016 - Elsevier

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of innovative colorectal cancer screening tests

EFP Peterse, RGS Meester, L de Jonge… - JNCI: Journal of the …, 2021 - academic.oup.com
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with colonoscopy and the fecal
immunochemical test (FIT) is underused. Innovative tests could increase screening …

Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

M Pignone, S Saha, T Hoerger… - Annals of internal …, 2002 - acpjournals.org
Purpose: To perform a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer
screening for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE and the …

Time to follow-up after colorectal cancer screening by health insurance type

N Breen, CS Skinner, Y Zheng, S Inrig… - American journal of …, 2019 - Elsevier
Introduction The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with Medicaid
insurance or Medicaid-like coverage would have longer times to follow-up and be less likely …

Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a microsimulation modelling study

M Buskermolen, DR Cenin, LM Helsingen, G Guyatt… - Bmj, 2019 - bmj.com
Objective To estimate benefits and harms of different colorectal cancer screening strategies,
stratified by (baseline) 15-year colorectal cancer risk. Design Microsimulation modelling …

Colonoscopy vs. fecal immunochemical test in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CONFIRM): rationale for study design

JA Dominitz, DJ Robertson, DJ Ahnen… - Official journal of the …, 2017 - journals.lww.com
Study design: The CONFIRM Study is a large, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, parallel
group trial to compare screening with colonoscopy vs. the annual fecal immunochemical test …

[引用][C] Evaluating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: a collaborative modeling approach

A Zauber, A Knudsen, CM Rutter, I Lansdorp-Vogelaar… - Rockville, MD: Agency for …, 2015

[HTML][HTML] Life-years gained resulting from screening colonoscopy compared with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based colorectal screening test

AM Fendrick, BJ Borah, AB Ozbay, L Saoud… - Preventive Medicine …, 2022 - Elsevier
Screening colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) are typically covered without patient
cost-sharing, whereas follow-up colonoscopies for positive stool-based screening tests often …

[HTML][HTML] Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening—age to begin, age to stop, and timing of screening intervals: a decision analysis of colorectal cancer …

AG Zauber, I Lansdorp-Vogelaar, AB Knudsen… - 2010 - europepmc.org
Background The US Preventive Services Task Force requested a decision analysis to inform
their update of the recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Objective To …