A thorough knowledge of biases in intervention studies and how they influence study results
is essential for the practice of evidence-based medicine. The objective of this review was to …

Objectives (1) To determine whether new tools and items have been developed to evaluate
the risk of bias (RoB) and reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in …

Objective To identify, synthesize, and categorize the methodological issues faced by the
rehabilitation field. Data Sources A scoping review was conducted using studies identified in …

Conclusions These findings suggest that attrition, missing data, compliance, and related
biases have an influence in treatment effect estimates in rehabilitation trials. Therefore …

Research in rehabilitation has grown from a rare phenomenon to a mature science and
clinical trials are now common. The purpose of this study is to estimate the extent to which …

Well-designed randomized controlled clinical trials assessing treatments in the field of
physical medicine and rehabilitation are essential for evidence-based patient care …

Are RCTs an appropriate gold standard?... I am researching the methodological issues
raised when conducting a RCT, and to some extent the impact of EBM (Evidence Based …

Horn SD, DeJong G, Deutscher D. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an
alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies. Sound …

This study aimed to synthesize evidence from studies that addressed the influence of bias
domains in randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates and …

Bias is a systematic error that can cause distorted results leading to incorrect conclusions.
Intervention bias (ie, contamination bias, cointervention bias, compliance bias, and …