Background The main objective was to assess whether CT reports of radiologists
subspecialized in oncologic imaging respond better to oncological referrals than reports …

Background Structured reporting and standardized criteria are increasingly recognized as
means of improving both radiological and clinical practice by allowing for better content and …

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with cancer who are referred to a dedicated
oncology center usually have undergone previous imaging studies that the oncologists …

Purpose To investigate and compare the opinions and expectations regarding the radiology
report of radiologists and referring clinicians and to identify trends, discordance, and …

Purpose To compare the content, clarity, and clinical usefulness of conventional (ie, free-
form) and structured radiology reports of body computed tomographic (CT) scans, as …

Purpose The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the quality of outside
hospital imaging and associated reports submitted to us for reinterpretation related to clinical …

Although radiological evaluation plays an integral role in the management of oncology
patients, little is known about which elements of such evaluation are most important or about …

PURPOSE: Our long-term goal is to improve the quality of reports in radiology imaging
interpretation. The rationale for this project focused on identifying the characteristics of a …

Objective To investigate what referring clinicians suggest when asked how the quality of
radiology reports can be improved. Methods At the end of the questionnaire of the COVER …

Purpose To explore the use of nonradiologists as a method to efficiently reduce bias in the
assessment of radiologist performance using a hepatobiliary tumor board as a case study …