Class III malocclusion is a consequence of maxillary deficiency and/or mandibular
prognathism, often resulting in an anterior crossbite and a concave profile. 1 Young patients …

Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the active treatment effects for
maxillary advancement induced by bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and the …

The choice of treatment of children with developing skeletal Class III malocclusions has
always posed a dilemma. Chin cups and various types of reverse headgears with elastics …

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare
orthodontic outcomes in patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion malocclusion …

Three different alternatives for the treatment of children with severe maxillary hypoplasia are
illustrated in this paper: prosthetic replacement, maxillary surgery, and protraction headgear …

Growing class III patients with maxillary deficiency may be treated with a maxillary
protraction facemask. Because the force generated by this appliance is applied to the teeth …

A 7-year-old girl with a cleft lip and palate had a midface retrusion due to growth inhibition of
the maxillary complex. She presented for correction of a severe total crossbite with a Class III …

Introduction This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the skeletal and dental effects of
miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction (MAMP) using hybrid hyrax (HH) and conventional …

Skeletal Class III malocclusion can be presented with maxillary retrogna thism or mandibular
prognathism or combination of both. Maxillary hypoplasia is characterized by deficiency of …

Objective: To compare the dentofacial effects of maxillary protraction with two facemask
therapies in growing Class III patients: facemask in association with miniscrew implants …