Objectives To compare the peri‐implant tissue response to subcrestal or crestal placement
of implants with or without “platform‐switched” implant/abutment connections. Material and …

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and
bone remodeling dynamics after immediate implant placement at different levels in relation …

Objective To compare peri‐implant soft‐and hard‐tissue integration at implants installed
juxta‐or sub‐crestally. Furthermore, differences in the hard and soft peri‐implant tissue …

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone remodeling and bone‐to‐
implant contact (BIC) after immediate placement at different levels in relation to the crestal …

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the transmucosal healing response of
implants placed with the junction of the smooth surfaces, either crestal or subcrestal, into …

Purpose To assess (i) the outcome of changing the horizontal‐offset dimension on the peri‐
implant soft tissues and the crestal bone and (ii) the effect of different healing abutments …

Aim To evaluate the effect of mismatching abutments on implants with a wider platform on
the peri‐implant hard tissue remodeling and the soft tissue dimensions. Material and …

Purpose: Implant design and the Implant-abutment interface have been regarded as key
influences on crestal bone maintenance over time. The aim of the present study was to …

Purpose: To evaluate the bone healing response to different implant root shape designs in a
dog model. Materials and Methods: Three by eight millimeter screw‐type short‐pitch (SP) …

Objectives The aim of the present study was to compare crestal bone loss with different
implant designs inserted immediately in crestal or subcrestal position in post‐extraction …