Radiofrequency ablation of subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas≤ 3 cm: analysis of long-term outcomes from two large-volume liver …

K Han, JH Kim, GH Kim, JH Kim, SY Kim, SH Park… - European …, 2024 - Springer
K Han, JH Kim, GH Kim, JH Kim, SY Kim, SH Park, S Moon, JH Kwon, GM Kim, SJ Lee…
European Radiology, 2024•Springer
Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of RFA for single HCCs≤ 3 cm in
subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular locations using a propensity score matched analysis.
Materials and methods This retrospective study included patients with solitary HCCs≤ 3 cm
in size who underwent percutaneous RFA from 2005 to 2015 as initial treatment at two large-
volume liver centers. Patients were divided into two groups, consisting of those with
subcapsular and nonsubcapsular tumor locations. Complications, local tumor progression …
Objectives
To compare the safety and efficacy of RFA for single HCCs ≤ 3 cm in subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular locations using a propensity score matched analysis.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients with solitary HCCs ≤ 3 cm in size who underwent percutaneous RFA from 2005 to 2015 as initial treatment at two large-volume liver centers. Patients were divided into two groups, consisting of those with subcapsular and nonsubcapsular tumor locations. Complications, local tumor progression (LTP), and overall survival (OS) were compared in these two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
The study population consisted of 964 patients (712 men [74%]) of mean age 58.3 years. Of these 964 patients, 561 (58%) had nonsubcapsular and 403 (42%) had subcapsular HCCs. PSM generated 402 pairs of patients. Major complication rate was low, but significantly higher in the subcapscular group (p = 0.047). Rates of technical effectiveness in these two groups were 99% and 98%, respectively (p = 0.315). However, during follow-up, cumulative 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year LTP and OS rates did significantly differ in both entire and PSM cohorts, resulting in the latter 8%, 15%, 20%, and 26% in the nonsubcapsular group vs. 13%, 24%, 30%, and 31% in the subcapsular group (p = 0.015), and 99%, 91%, 80%, and 59% vs. 98%, 85%, 73%, and 50% in the two groups (p = 0.004), respectively.
Conclusion
Rates of major complications, LTP, and OS differed significantly following first-line RFA treatment of single HCCs ≤ 3 cm in favor of the nonsubcapsular locations.
Clinical relevance statement
This large-scale study provides evidence that radiofrequency ablation for small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas is safer and more effective in nonsubcapsular location than in subcapsular location.
Key Points
• There exist conflicting outcomes on the effectiveness of RFA for early HCC depending on tumor location.
• Rate of local tumor progression was significantly higher in the subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas.
• Overall survival rate was significantly poorer in the subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas.
Springer
展开收起
被引用次数：1 相关文章 所有 2 个版本
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果