Objective To compare implant accuracy of combined static and dynamic (SD) computer‐
assisted implant surgery (CAIS) with static (S), dynamic (D) CAIS, and freehand surgery (FH) …

Objectives The aim of this RCT was to compare the accuracy of implant placement between
static and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS) systems in single tooth space …

Objectives This in-vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement using static
versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) at two implant sites. Methods …

The optimal implant position is a critical factor for long-term success in fully edentulous
patients. Implants can be placed through conventional freehand, static computer-assisted …

Background Computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS) can facilitate accuracy of single
implant placement, but little is known with regards to parallelism between multiple implants …

Objectives To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer–aided implant surgery (dCAIS)
systems when used to place dental implants and to compare its accuracy with static …

Objective To compare the accuracy of implant position, using a combination of static and
dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (CAIS), with either static, dynamic, or freehand …

Background To ensure accurate implant placement, surgical guides are used to control the
steps of implant placement surgery. Purpose Evaluation of the accuracy of implant …

Objective To investigate the effect of surgical guide support and implant site location on the
accuracy of static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) in partially edentulous …

Objectives To assess dental implant placement accuracy with a dynamic computer‐assisted
implant surgery (dCAIS) system and a freehand approach. Secondarily, to compare the …