Aim There is still no consensus whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is as safe
and effective as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) …

Background There is considerable debate regarding the overall benefits of percutaneous
coronary intervention (PCI), compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the …

Introduction: There is clear evidence of a significant reduction in all major cardiovascular
adverse events (MACE) by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in left main coronary …

Background: Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are
increasingly treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents …

A recent meta-analysis, report, and editorial all agreed with the need for a randomized trial
of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with coronary-artery bypass …

Coronary artery bypass surgery is the currently accepted treatment for unprotected left main
coronary artery disease. Currently, the data supporting the safety and efficacy of stents for …

Background The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery
disease is still controversial. This is systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate …

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for high-grade stenosis of the left
main coronary artery with bare-metal stents has been limited by restenosis, and most …

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is currently
considered as a viable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for …

For several decades, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been regarded as the
treatment of choice for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease …