If description of mental processes and evaluation of agents and their beliefs are rightly to be
considered as complementary concerns on any plausible construal of the epistemological …

Intellectualism is the claim that practical knowledge or 'know-how'is a kind of propositional
knowledge. The debate over intellectualism has appealed to two different kinds of evidence …

How can we be responsible for our attitudes if we cannot normally choose what we believe,
desire, feel, and intend? This problem has received much attention during the last decades …

Thus, knowledge and belief, reference, meaning, and truth, and reasoning, explaining, and
learning, are each the focus of eroded confidence in" the grand old paradigm," a framework …

An overview is presented of what I take to be (some main aspects of) the role of the
intellectual virtues within the epistemological enterprise. Traditionally, the theory of …

Developers of NBIC (Nano‐Bio‐Info‐Cogno) technologies face a multitude of obstacles, not
the least of which is navigating the public ethics of their applied research. Biotechnologies …

In this introduction we explore a number of puzzles that arise concerning epistemic
autonomy, and introduce the sections and chapters of the book. There are four broad types …

On the assumption that genuinely normative demands concern things connected in some
way to our agency, ie what we exercise in doing things with or for reasons, epistemologists …

Recently some bioethicists and neuroscientists have argued for an imperative of chemical
cognitive enhancement. This imperative is usually based on consequentialist grounds. In …

We call beliefs reasonable or unreasonable, justified or unjustified. What does this imply
about belief? Does this imply that we are responsible for our beliefs and that we should be …